ArticleSustainable computing : informatics and systems2023
Multivariate time-series sensor vital sign forecasting of cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases.
Article in Sustainable computing : informatics and systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Malting and Brewer's Spent Grain in Sustainable Cereal Utilization.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Using convolutional neural networks with late fusion to predict heart disease.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Simultaneous forecasting of vital sign trajectories in the ICU.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Assessing the impact of the National Clean Air Programme in Uttar Pradesh's non-attainment cities: a prophet model time series analysis.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Approximately 19 million people die each year from cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases. As a result of the recent Covid-19 epidemic, blood pressure, cholesterol, and blood sugar levels have risen. Not only do healthcare institutions benefit from studying physiological vital signs, but individuals also benefit from being alerted to health problems in a timely manner. This study uses machine learning to categorize and predict cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases. By predicting a patient's health status, caregivers and medical professionals can be alerted when needed. We predicted vital signs for 180 seconds using real-world vital sign data. A person's life can be saved if caregivers react quickly and anticipate emergencies. The tree-based pipeline optimization method (TPOT) is used instead of manually adjusting machine learning classifiers. This paper focuses on optimizing classification accuracy by combining feature pre-processors and machine learning models with TPOT genetic programming making use of linear and Prophet models to predict important indicators. The TPOT tuning parameter combines predicted values with classical classification models such as Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Machines, and Random Forests. As a result of this study, we show the importance of categorizing and increasing the accuracy of predictions. The proposed model achieves its adaptive behavior by conceptually incorporating different machine learning classifiers. We compare the proposed model with several state-of-the-art algorithms using a large amount of training data. Test results at the University of Queensland using 32 patient's data showed that the proposed model outperformed existing algorithms, improving the classification of cardiovascular disease from 0.58 to 0.71 and chronic respiratory disease from 0.49 to 0.70, respectively, while minimizing the mean percent error in vital signs. Our results suggest that the Facebook Prophet prediction model in conjunction with the TPOT classification model can correctly diagnose a patient's health status based on abnormal vital signs and enables patients to receive prompt medical attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.