Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37168386›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of a decision aid on mammography screening uptake: study protocol.

Sandrine Hild, Delphine Teigné, Emilie Ferrat, Anne-Sophie Banaszuk, Karine Berquet, Aline Lebon, Emmanuelle Bataille, France Nanin, Aurélie Gaultier, Cédric Rat

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05607849 (Shared Decision-making for Breast Cancer Screening in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05607849 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Shared Decision-making for Breast Cancer Screening in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorNantes University HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled20,000ConditionsBreast CancerArmsThe decidons ensemble (let's decide together) leaflet and the discutons-mammo.fr (let's talk about breast cancer screening) online tool.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sandrine HildGeneral Practice Department, Faculty of Médecine, Nantes, France.
Delphine TeignéGeneral Practice Department, Faculty of Médecine, Nantes, France.
Emilie FerratClinical Epidemiology ans Ageing (CEpiA), University Paris-Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB, Paris, France.
Anne-Sophie BanaszukRegional Organization in Charge of Cancer Screening Programmes, Angers, France.
Karine BerquetRegional Organization in Charge of Cancer Screening Programmes, Angers, France.
Aline LebonRegional Organization in Charge of Cancer Screening Programmes, Angers, France.
Emmanuelle BatailleDepartment of Statistics and Studies, Health Insurance System, Nantes, France.
France NaninDepartment of Statistics and Studies, Health Insurance System, Nantes, France.
Aurélie GaultierGeneral Practice Department, Faculty of Médecine, Nantes, France.
Cédric RatGeneral Practice Department, Faculty of Médecine, Nantes, France.
Centre Val de Loire · FRNantes Université · FRSanté Publique France · FRImmunologie et Nouveaux Concepts en ImmunothérapieParis-Est Sup · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Breast cancer (BC) is the primary cancer among women. The World Health Organization recommends a bilateral screening mammogram every 2 years for women aged 50 to 74 years. However, it has been shown that there is an absence of information about the benefits and risks of screening. Shared medical decision-making is important to ensure patients are involved in the decision process. Decision aids can facilitative this decision-making process. This article presents a protocol to evaluate the effect of a decision aid on participation rates in the French organized BC screening program. Methods and analysis: Design and setting. The design is a 2 arm randomized controlled study, performed in the Pays de la Loire region (French West Coast). Randomization will be based on general medicine practices (Primary Care). Participants: Women aged between 50 and 74 years, eligible for BC screening. In this region, there are 75000 women, and 2800 general practitioners eligible for recruitment. Intervention: In the « Decision aid for organized cancer screening » arm, the intervention will distribute invitation letters to eligible women combined with the provision of decision aid to these women and their general practitioners and an incentive to implement shared medical decision-making. In the « Standard organized cancer screening » arm, only the screening invitation will be sent to eligible women. Primary endpoint: BC screening participation rates will be assessed after an 18-month follow-up period. Statistical analysis: In this non-inferiority trial, the percentage of women who are up-to-date with their screening at 18 months after the intervention will be compared across arms using a generalized mixed linear model. Discussion: The research team expect to demonstrate that providing a better explanation of the benefits and risks of BC screening is not at odds with screening participation. The study results should help policy makers thinking about implementing shared medical decision-making within the framework of organized BC screening programs in the future. Ethics and dissemination: On 6 December 2021, the protocol received a favorable opinion from the French Committee for the Protection of Persons (2021-A01583-38). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT05607849. (Version 1, November 7, 2022; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05607849). The study findings will be used for publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presentations in scientific meetings.

Indexed as

breast cancer screeningdecision aidgeneral practitionerorganized screeningrandomized controlled trialshared medical decision making

Identifiers

PMID37168386
PMCPMC10165111
OpenAlexW4366987992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.