ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2023
The diagnostic value of circulating abnormal cells in early lung cancer.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Potentialities and critical issues of liquid biopsy in clinical practice: An umbrella review.Translational oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Early detection of lung cancer can lead to more effective treatment and improved survival. Circulatory abnormal cells (CACs) with specific chromosomal variation may be used to diagnose lung cancer and to differentiate benign from malignant nodules. The value of CAC in precancer diagnosis, however, remains controversial. In this study, a systematic review and meta-analysis are conducted to clarify the diagnostic value of CAC in early-stage lung cancer. A systematic literature search was conducted using the following medical topic title terms and text-free words: "circulating genetically abnormal cells", "CACs", "liquid biopsy", "early lung cancer", "non-small cell lung cancer", "diagnostic accuracy", "sensitivity" and "specificity" in Science Direct, CNKI and Wanfang databases, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and area under the curve were analyzed by STATA15.0 (MP) software. Deek funnel plots were used to assess potential publication bias. Heterogeneity was tested using the I2 statistic and the Cochrane Q test. 7 major studies were included in this meta-analysis, and a total of 53728 participants were analyzed. In the diagnosis of early lung cancer, CAC had pooled sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristics of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.73-0.86), 0.85 (95% CI: 0.69-0.94), and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84-0.90). The combined positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and diagnostic score were 23.36 (95% CI: 7.33-74.46), 5.42 (95% CI: 2.37-12.43), 0.23 (95% CI: 0.16-0.35) and 3.15 (95% CI: 1.99-4.31) respectively. Publication bias was not detected. The CAC is effective at detecting lung cancer in its early stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37168347PMC10164803What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.