Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37168341›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2023

The signature of immune-subtype specific driving transcription factors suggest potential drugs for refractory glioblastoma.

Wenjin Chen, Lihua Chen, Lili Guo, Ning Liu, Tao Wu, Yajing Cheng, Pengfei Xu, Yifei Li, Xiaofang Yang, Ruxiang Xu and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wenjin ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen Peking University-The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center Shenzhen 518000, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Lihua ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sichuan Academy of Medical Science and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Chengdu 610072, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Lili GuoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sichuan Academy of Medical Science and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Chengdu 610072, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Ning LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital Beijing 100000, P. R. China.
Tao WuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen Peking University-The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center Shenzhen 518000, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Yajing ChengDepartment of Neurology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen Peking University-The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center Shenzhen 518000, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Pengfei XuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen Peking University-The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center Shenzhen 518000, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Yifei LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen Peking University-The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center Shenzhen 518000, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Xiaofang YangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen Peking University-The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center Shenzhen 518000, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Ruxiang XuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sichuan Academy of Medical Science and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Chengdu 610072, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Baodong ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen Peking University-The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center Shenzhen 518000, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Peking University Shenzhen Hospital · CNSichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital · CNChinese PLA General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunocharacteristics-based typing strategies can be used to reflect the similar status of tumors. Therefore, we aimed to demonstrate whether the immune subtypes of GBM have independent prognostic efficacy and whether these subtypes can be used as clinical guidance for predicting the progression of GBM and determining drug sensitivity. In this study, we found that patients with GBM were divided into three conserved immune-related subtypes based on the infiltration level of immune cells, including immunosuppressed, moderate immunoactivity, and high immunoactivity. Regarding the relevant clinical significance, the high immunoactivity in GBM indicates the worst survival, which exhibited the highest levels of oncogenic activity, including angiogenesis, tumor-associated macrophages and tumor-associated fibroblasts, indicated worst survival. The immunosuppressive subtype of GBM was more likely to carry epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and MGMT methylation, and belong to the classical and proneural subtypes; however, but the high immunoactivity subtype was not. The immune subtype-specific transcription factors (TFs) regulatory network indicates that specific TFs drive the construction of each immune subtype, and that these subtype-specific TFs are more prone to internal TFs regulation. Furthermore, the immunosuppressed and moderate immunoactivity subtypes were significantly correlated with the drugs sensitivity, whereas the high immunoactivity subtype was not, indicating that GBMs with high immunoactivity were refractory. We also found that obatoclax mesylate, NPK76-II-72-1, gemcitabine, TAK-715 are potential drugs for the treatment of refractory GBM based on drug sensitivity models of different immune subtypes. Therefore, we demonstrated that the immune subtypes of GBM have independent prognostic efficacy and can be used as clinical guidance for predicting the progression of GBM and drug sensitivity. Most importantly, this study is expected to provide a pathway for the development of effective drugs for treatment of refractory GBM.

Indexed as

drug sensitivityGlioblastomaimmune infiltrationimmune subtypestranscription factors

Identifiers

PMID37168341
PMCPMC10164812
OpenAlexW4376224891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.