Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37168303›Full record

ReviewJournal of medicine and life2023

Brain imaging and morphological plasticity in glioblastoma: a literature review.

Andreea-Anamaria Idu, Nicolae-Stefan Bogaciu, Alexandru Vlad Ciurea

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medicine and life, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Andreea-Anamaria IduDepartment of Neurosurgery, Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France.
Nicolae-Stefan BogaciuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Annecy-Genevois Hospital, Annecy, France.
Alexandru Vlad CiureaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sanador Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROCentre Hospitalier Annecy Genevois · FRHôpitaux Universitaires Henri-Mondor · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive review of the role of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in characterizing neural plasticity in glioblastoma patients. Glioblastoma, the most common primary brain tumor, has a rapid growth rate and infiltrative nature that leads to the disorganization of the normal brain network. Neuroplasticity, still not fully understood, is the foundation for the development of brain functions during the growth and recovery of certain brain functions after a brain lesion such as a tumor, trauma, or vascular event. Functional MRI has the capacity to identify the regions that activate at rest or when performing a task. It can determine the extent to which these regions, responsible for a specific function, are impacted by a tumor and eventually after surgical excision. Likewise, it can help evaluate to which extent activation changes when recovery of function occurs. In this article, we aimed to understand the significance of fMRI in the management of glioblastoma by analyzing representative articles from the literature.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingNeuronal Plasticityfunctional MRIglioblastomaneuroplasticity

Identifiers

PMID37168303
PMCPMC10165525
OpenAlexW4376224277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.