Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37168298›Full record

ReviewJournal of medicine and life2023

Unfavorable factors in accessing the pelvicalyceal system during retrograde flexible ureteroscopy (fURS).

Bogdan Geavlete, Cristian Mareș, Răzvan-Ionuț Popescu, Răzvan Mulțescu, Cosmin Ene, Petrișor Geavlete

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medicine and life, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Kidney collecting system anatomy applied to endourology - a narrative review.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bogdan GeavleteSanador Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Cristian MareșDepartment of Urology, Emergency Clinical Hospital Sf. Ioan, Bucharest, Romania.
Răzvan-Ionuț PopescuDepartment of Urology, Emergency Clinical Hospital Sf. Ioan, Bucharest, Romania.
Răzvan MulțescuSanador Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Cosmin EneDepartment of Urology, Emergency Clinical Hospital Sf. Ioan, Bucharest, Romania.
Petrișor GeavleteSanador Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) is a well-established procedure for treating multiple upper-urinary tract pathologies, particularly renoureteral lithiasis. Endoscopes have undergone significant advancements, including miniaturization, improved optics, and increased maneuverability. In addition, advancements in accessory instruments, such as the performance of laser fibers, guidewires, and extraction probes, have played a significant role in improving the overall performance of flexible ureteroscopy procedures. However, despite these advancements, unique circumstances can make achieving optimum results during flexible ureteroscopy challenging. These include congenital renal anomalies (horseshoe kidneys, ectopic kidneys, rotation anomalies), as well as the unique intrarenal anatomy (infundibulopelvic angle, infundibular length) or the specifications of the endoscope in terms of maneuverability (active and passive deflection). This review explored challenging scenarios during flexible ureteroscopy procedures in the pyelocaliceal system.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiUreteroscopyHumansKidneyectopic kidneyflexible ureteroscopyhorseshoe kidneypassive deflectionrenal malformations

Identifiers

PMID37168298
PMCPMC10165511
OpenAlexW4376224093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.