Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37168287›Full record

ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2023

A genomic enhancer signature associates with hepatocellular carcinoma prognosis.

Ah-Jung Jeon, Chukwuemeka George Anene-Nzelu, Yue-Yang Teo, Shay Lee Chong, Karthik Sekar, Lingyan Wu, Sin-Chi Chew, Jianbin Chen, Raden Indah Kendarsari, Hannah Lai and 27 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Crosstalk BetweenCancers · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Ah-Jung JeonProgram in Clinical and Translational Liver Cancer Research, Division of Medical Science, National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore.
Chukwuemeka George Anene-NzeluCardiovascular Disease Translational Research Programme, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Yue-Yang TeoProgram in Clinical and Translational Liver Cancer Research, Division of Medical Science, National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore.
Shay Lee ChongProgram in Clinical and Translational Liver Cancer Research, Division of Medical Science, National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore.
Karthik SekarProgram in Clinical and Translational Liver Cancer Research, Division of Medical Science, National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore.
Lingyan WuProgram in Clinical and Translational Liver Cancer Research, Division of Medical Science, National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore.
Sin-Chi ChewProgram in Clinical and Translational Liver Cancer Research, Division of Medical Science, National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore.
Jianbin ChenGenome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A∗STAR), Singapore.
Raden Indah KendarsariGenome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A∗STAR), Singapore.
Hannah LaiGenome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A∗STAR), Singapore.
Wen Huan LingProgram in Clinical and Translational Liver Cancer Research, Division of Medical Science, National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore.
Neslihan Arife KayaGenome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A∗STAR), Singapore.
Jia Qi LimGenome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A∗STAR), Singapore.
Alexander Yaw Fui ChungDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, National Cancer Centre Singapore and Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Peng-Chung CheowDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, National Cancer Centre Singapore and Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Juinn Huar KamDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, National Cancer Centre Singapore and Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Krishnakumar MadhavanDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore.
Alfred KowDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore.
Iyer Shridhar GanpathiDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore.
Tony Kiat Hon LimDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Wei-Qiang LeowDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Shihleone LoongDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Tracy Jiezhen LohDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Wei Keat WanDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Gwyneth Shook Ting SoonDepartment of Pathology, National University Hospital, Singapore.
Yin Huei PangDepartment of Pathology, National University Hospital, Singapore.
Boon Koon YoongDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Diana Bee-Lan OngDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Jasmine LimDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Vanessa H de VillaDepartment of Surgery and Center for Liver Health and Transplantation, The Medical City, Pasig City, Philippines.
Rouchelle D Dela CruzDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, The Medical City, Pasig City, Philippines.
Rawisak ChanwatHepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jidapa ThammasiriDivision of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, Thailand.
Glenn K BonneyDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore.
Brian K P GohDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, National Cancer Centre Singapore and Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Roger Sik Yin FooCardiovascular Disease Translational Research Programme, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Pierce Kah-Hoe ChowProgram in Clinical and Translational Liver Cancer Research, Division of Medical Science, National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore.
Singapore General Hospital · SGAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGNational Cancer Centre Singapore · SGNational University Health System · SGNational Cancer Institute of Thailand · THNational University Hospital · SGUniversity of Asia and the Pacific · PHUniversity of Malaya · MYNational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & Aims: Lifestyle and environmental-related exposures are important risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), suggesting that epigenetic dysregulation significantly underpins HCC. We profiled 30 surgically resected tumours and the matched adjacent normal tissues to understand the aberrant epigenetic events associated with HCC. Methods: We identified tumour differential enhancers and the associated genes by analysing H3K27 acetylation (H3K27ac) chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) and Hi-C/HiChIP data from the resected tumour samples of 30 patients with early-stage HCC. This epigenome dataset was analysed with previously reported genome and transcriptome data of the overlapping group of patients from the same cohort. We performed patient-specific differential expression testing using multiregion sequencing data to identify genes that undergo both enhancer and gene expression changes. Based on the genes selected, we identified two patient groups and performed a recurrence-free survival analysis. Results: We observed large-scale changes in the enhancer distribution between HCC tumours and the adjacent normal samples. Many of the gain-in-tumour enhancers showed corresponding upregulation of the associated genes and Conclusions: We report the genomic enhancer signature associated with differential prognosis in HCC. Findings that cohere with oncofoetal reprogramming in HCC were underpinned by genome-wide enhancer rewiring. Our results present the epigenetic changes in HCC that offer the rational selection of epigenetic-driven gene targets for therapeutic intervention or disease prognostication in HCC. Impact and Implications: Lifestyle and environmental-related exposures are the important risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), suggesting that tumour-associated epigenetic dysregulations may significantly underpin HCC. We profiled tumour tissues and their matched normal from 30 patients with early-stage HCC to study the dysregulated epigenetic changes associated with HCC. By also analysing the patients' RNA-seq and clinical data, we found the signature genes - with epigenetic and transcriptomic dysregulation - associated with worse prognosis. Our findings suggest that systemic approaches are needed to consider the surrounding cellular environmental and epigenetic changes in HCC tumours.

Indexed as

Cancer prognosisEpigeneticsHepatocellular carcinomaMulti-omicsPersonalised medicine

Identifiers

PMID37168287
PMCPMC10165154
OpenAlexW4322154777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.