ArticleInternational journal of women's health2023
A Case Report of Retroperitoneal Ectopic Pregnancy After in vitro Fertilization-Embryo Transfer and Literature Review.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy localized to the mesorectum: A case report and mini-review of literature.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Review
- Minimally Invasive Management and Diagnosis of Ectopic Splenic Pregnancy.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- A Case Report of Retroperitoneal Ectopic Pregnancy and Review of Literature.International journal of women's health · 2024Article
- Rare Unilateral Twin Ectopic Pregnancy After Frozen Embryo Transfer: A Case Report and Literature Review.International medical case reports journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy (REP) is an extremely rare type of ectopic pregnancy that can be life threatening. The pathogenesis of REP remains inconclusive and the diagnosis and treatment modalities are unclear. Case Presentation and Review of the Literature: A 27-year-old woman (gravida: 3; parturition: 0) underwent transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) 40 days after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET); no intrauterine gestational sac was detected. The patient was asymptomatic and had no abnormalities on physical examination. β-HCG and progesterone were 18.210 mIU/mL and 10.891 ng/mL, respectively. Transabdominal ultrasound (TAS) showed that the gestational sac had implanted adjacent to the abdominal aorta and near a branch of the iliac artery. Laparoscopic exploration was performed under general anesthesia; intraoperative findings showed that the gestational sac was approximately 2.5 cm in diameter and in the same location as suggested by preoperative ultrasound. Histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of EP. On day three post-surgery, the levels of β-HCG had fallen to 911 mIU/mL. We further systematically reviewed the REP cases reported in the English literature and performed a review on the diagnosis and treatment of REP. Conclusion: Clinicians should be alert to the occurrence of REP. Combined radiological examinations including ultrasonography (TAS and TVS), CT, and MRI are essential for the early diagnosis of REP. Once a definitive diagnosis is made, appropriate treatment should be administered immediately. Although there are cases of successful drug treatment described in the literature, surgery remains as the primary treatment option for REP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.