Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37168235›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2023

The Effect of Mini Dental Implant Number on Mandibular Overdenture Retention and Attachment Wear.

Rafif Alshenaiber, Craig Barclay, Nick Silikas

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rafif AlshenaiberProsthetic Dental Sciences Department at College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3872-0834
Craig BarclayOral Rehabilitation, University Dental Hospital of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8716-7265
Nick SilikasDivision of Dentistry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Coupland 3 Building, UK Manchester M13 9PL.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4576-4584
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University · SAUniversity Dental Hospital of Manchester · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Evaluate the effect of different mini-implant numbers on overdenture retention and evaluate attachment wear following one year of simulated placement/removal. Results: The retention was significantly reduced regardless of the mini dental implant number, but the number affected overdenture retention. The placement of 4 mini dental implants provided higher retention and less reduction in retentiveness. However, no significant difference was found when 3 mini dental implants were compared to 2 mini dental implants ( Conclusion: Mini dental implant overdenture retention force and attachment wear could improve by increasing the mini dental implants to 4. However, there was no difference in retention force or attachment wear when 2 or 3 mini dental implant overdentures were compared.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsDental Stress AnalysisDenture, OverlayDenture RetentionMandibleMicroscopyDental Implants

Identifiers

PMID37168235
PMCPMC10164865
OpenAlexW4367555870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.