ArticleCureus2023
A Retained Foreign Body as a Rare Cause of Small Bowel Obstruction (Gossypiboma): A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Lost and found: trends in litigation and compensation related to retained surgical foreign bodies.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Delayed intestinal obstruction from an unintentionally retained surgical gauze in a 24-year old woman two years after caesarean section: a case report.Patient safety in surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A retained foreign body (RFB) is a rare but possible complication of surgery. Among the most common retained foreign bodies are sponges, which may include lap pads and gauze pieces. Surgical never events are errors in medical care that are identifiable and preventable but have serious consequences for the patient, making it an important problem in terms of the safety and credibility of a healthcare facility. They also pose a major medicolegal threat to healthcare organizations and a diagnostic challenge for surgeons. Herein, we present the case of a 35-year-old woman who presented with signs and symptoms of acute intestinal obstruction. She revealed a history of Caesarean section 11 months prior. She had a stormy postoperative course then and had to undergo a diagnostic laparoscopy for pus aspiration three months after surgery, where no finding other than pus was reported. Upon presentation at our tertiary care center, she was examined and found to have an RFB for 11 months. She was managed surgically with successful laparoscopic removal of the gossypiboma and consequent resolution of all her symptoms. Though rare, the possibility of an RFB, especially after open surgery, should be kept in mind when diagnosing patients who present with pain, mass in the abdomen, or symptoms of an infection. Laparotomy is the mainstay of treatment for gossypiboma, but successful laparoscopic removal of the RFB provides a definite treatment with the super-added benefits of laparoscopy. Laparoscopic removal of gossypiboma has been reported in the literature and demonstrated in our tertiary care center.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.