Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37168138›Full record

ArticleApplied network science2022

Network loss following the 2016 Presidential Election among LGBTQ+ adults.

Matthew Facciani, Tara McKay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied network science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Associations of Faith Community Rejection With Social Support and Health Outcomes Among LGBTQ+ Older Adults.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matthew FaccianiVanderbilt University, Nashville, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4452-5912
Tara McKayVanderbilt University, Nashville, USA.

Funding

Understanding How Personal Networks ChangeR01AG041955 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI FISCHER, CLAUDE S. · 2013 to 2017
$3.6M
Effects of Social Networks and Policy Context on Health among Older Sexual and Gender Minorities in the US SouthR01AG063771 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MCKAY, TARA · 2019 to 2023
$2.6M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG041955NIA NIH HHS R01 AG063771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growing levels of political polarization in the United States have been associated with political homogeneity in the personal networks of American adults. The 2016 Presidential Election in the United States was a polarizing event that may have caused further loss of connections to alters who had different politics. Kinship may protect against loss of politically different ties. Additionally, loss of ties with different political views may be particularly pronounced among LGBTQ+ people as they are more likely to be impacted by public policy decisions compared to their heterosexual counterparts. We analyzed two waves of the University of California, Berkeley Social Networks Study's (UCNets) Main Sample and LGBTQ+ Oversample of older adults that occurred in 2015 and 2017, which provided an opportunity to assess alter loss after the 2016 Presidential Election. When evaluating all adults, we found that politically different alters were more likely to reflect kin ties than partner or friend ties. We also found that politically different kin are less likely to be dropped suggesting that kinship acts as a moderating effect of different political views on alter loss. LGBTQ+ respondents were more likely to drop kin alters with different political views than their cisgender heterosexual counterparts. We discuss the implications these results have for political polarization interventions as well as the social networks impact politics can have on LGBTQ+ individuals.

Indexed as

Alter lossKin tiesLGBTQ+Political polarizationSocial networks

Identifiers

PMID37168138
PMCPMC10168680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.