ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023
Microbial source tracking identifies sources of contamination for a river flowing into the Yellow Sea.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microbial diversity as the next frontier of payments for ecosystem services in nature-positive finance.npj biodiversity · 2026Review
- Limited Microbial Contribution in Salt Lake Sediment and Water to Each Other's Microbial Communities.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- The source of microbial transmission influences niche colonization and microbiome development.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- The presence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria at four Norwegian wastewater treatment plants: seasonal and wastewater-source effects.Frontiers in antibiotics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The excessive input of nutrients into rivers can lead to contamination and eutrophication, which poses a threat to the health of aquatic ecosystems. It is crucial to identify the sources of contaminants to develop effective management plans for eutrophication. However, traditional methods for identifying pollution sources have been insufficient, making it difficult to manage river health effectively. High-throughput sequencing offers a novel method for microbial community source tracking, which can help identify dominant pollution sources in rivers. The Wanggang River was selected for study, as it has suffered accelerated eutrophication due to considerable nutrient input from riparian pollutants. The present study identified the dominant microbial communities in the Wanggang River basin, including Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Cyanobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, and Firmicutes. The Source Tracker machine-learning classification system was used to create source-specific microbial community fingerprints to determine the primary sources of contaminants in the basin, with agricultural fertilizer being identified as the main pollutant source. By identifying the microbial communities of potential pollution sources, the study determined the contributing pollutant sources in several major sections of the Wanggang River, including industry, urban land, pond culture, and livestock land. These findings can be used to improve the identification of pollution sources in specific environments and develop effective pollution management plans for polluted river water.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.