Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37168101›Full record

ArticleNational science review2023

Experimental quantum secure network with digital signatures and encryption.

Hua-Lei Yin, Yao Fu, Chen-Long Li, Chen-Xun Weng, Bing-Hong Li, Jie Gu, Yu-Shuo Lu, Shan Huang, Zeng-Bing Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in National science review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Chip-integrated quantum signature network over 200 km.Light, science & applications · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Quantum Secure Multi-Party Summation with Graph State.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  16. Experimental quantum e-commerce.Science advances · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Post-Quantum Security: Opportunities and Challenges.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hua-Lei YinNational Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures, School of Physics, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7718-0818
Yao FuMatricTime Digital Technology Co. Ltd., Nanjing 211899, China.
Chen-Long LiNational Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures, School of Physics, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China.
Chen-Xun WengNational Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures, School of Physics, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7287-4386
Bing-Hong LiNational Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures, School of Physics, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China.
Jie GuNational Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures, School of Physics, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China.
Yu-Shuo LuNational Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures, School of Physics, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China.
Shan HuangNational Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures, School of Physics, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4160-1366
Zeng-Bing ChenNational Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures, School of Physics, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryptography promises four information security objectives, namely, confidentiality, integrity, authenticity and non-repudiation, to support trillions of transactions annually in the digital economy. Efficient digital signatures, ensuring integrity, authenticity and non-repudiation of data with information-theoretical security are highly urgent and intractable open problems in cryptography. Here, we propose a high-efficiency quantum digital signature (QDS) protocol using asymmetric quantum keys acquired via secret sharing, one-time universal

Indexed as

cryptography toolboxinformation-theoretical securityone-time universal2 hashingquantum digital signaturesecret sharing

Identifiers

PMID37168101
PMCPMC10165682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.