Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37168037›Full record

ReviewClinical interventions in aging2023

Geriatric Radiation Oncology: What We Know and What Can We Do Better?

Falk Roeder, Alexandra D Jensen, Katja Lindel, Matthias Mattke, Frank Wolf, Sabine Gerum

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical interventions in aging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Falk RoederDepartment of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University Hospital, Salzburg, Austria.
Alexandra D JensenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Marburg-Giessen, Giessen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9864-539X
Katja LindelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Städtisches Klinikum, Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2651-4275
Matthias MattkeDepartment of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University Hospital, Salzburg, Austria.
Frank WolfDepartment of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University Hospital, Salzburg, Austria.
Sabine GerumDepartment of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University Hospital, Salzburg, Austria.
Paracelsus Medical University · ATStädtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe · DEUniversitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elderly patients represent a growing subgroup of cancer patients for whom the role of radiation therapy is poorly defined. Older patients are still clearly underrepresented in clinical trials, resulting in very limited high-level evidence. Moreover, elderly patients are less likely to receive radiation therapy in similar clinical scenarios compared to younger patients. However, there is no clear evidence for a generally reduced radiation tolerance with increasing age. Modern radiation techniques have clearly reduced acute and late side effects, thus extending the boundaries of the possible regarding treatment intensity in elderly or frail patients. Hypofractionated regimens have further decreased the socioeconomic burden of radiation treatments by reducing the overall treatment time. The current review aims at summarizing the existing data for the use of radiation therapy or chemoradiation in elderly patients focusing on the main cancer types. It provides an overview of treatment tolerability and outcomes with current standard radiation therapy regimens, including possible predictive factors in the elderly population. Strategies for patient selection for standard or tailored radiation therapy approaches based on age, performance score or comorbidity, including the use of prediction tests or geriatric assessments, are discussed. Current and future possibilities for improvements of routine care and creation of high-level evidence in elderly patients receiving radiation therapy are highlighted.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsRadiation OncologyAgedChemoradiotherapyGeriatric AssessmentHumanselderlygeriatric assessmentradiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID37168037
PMCPMC10166100
OpenAlexW4367856543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.