Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37168030›Full record

ArticleOTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma2023

Reaming the intramedullary canal during tibial nailing does not affect in vivo intramuscular pH of the anterior tibialis.

Loren O Black, Megan Rushkin, Karalynn Lancaster, J Samuel Cheesman, James E Meeker, Jung U Yoo, Darin M Friess, Zachary M Working

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Loren O BlackDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
Megan RushkinDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
Karalynn LancasterDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
J Samuel CheesmanDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
James E MeekerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
Jung U YooDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
Darin M FriessDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
Zachary M WorkingDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many investigations have evaluated local and systemic consequences of intramedullary (IM) reaming and suggest that reaming may cause, or exacerbate, injury to the soft tissues adjacent to fractures. To date, no study has examined the effect on local muscular physiology as measured by intramuscular pH (IpH). Here, we observe in vivo IpH during IM reaming for tibia fractures. Methods: Adults with acute tibia shaft fractures (level 1, academic, 2019-2021) were offered enrollment in an observational cohort. During IM nailing, a sterile, validated IpH probe was placed into the anterior tibialis (<5 cm from fracture, continuous sampling, independent research team). IpH before, during, and after reaming was averaged and compared through repeated measures ANOVA. As the appropriate period to analyze IpH during reaming is unknown, the analysis was repeated over periods of 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, and 15 minutes prereaming and postreaming time intervals. Results: Sixteen subjects with tibia shaft fractures were observed during nailing. Average time from injury to surgery was 35.0 hours (SD, 31.8). Starting and ending perioperative IpH was acidic, averaging 6.64 (SD, 0.21) and 6.74 (SD, 0.17), respectively. Average reaming time lasted 15 minutes. Average IpH during reaming was 6.73 (SD, 0.15). There was no difference in IpH between prereaming, intrareaming, and postreaming periods. IpH did not differ regardless of analysis over short or long time domains compared with the duration of reaming. Conclusions: Reaming does not affect IpH. Both granular and broad time domains were tested, revealing no observable local impact.

Indexed as

anterior tibialispHtibial nailing

Identifiers

PMID37168030
PMCPMC10166333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.