Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37167983›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet. Global health2023

Measuring stillbirth and perinatal mortality rates through household surveys: a population-based analysis using an integrated approach to data quality assessment and adjustment with 157 surveys from 53 countries.

Mohamed M Ali, Saverio Bellizzi, Ties Boerma

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet. Global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Call for Improved Fourth Trimester Care After Stillbirth.Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Data considerations in measuring stillbirths in India.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohamed M AliDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland. Electronic address: alim@who.int.
Saverio BellizziWHO Jordan Country Office, Amman, Jordan.
Ties BoermaInstitute for Global Public Health, Max Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
University of Manitoba · CAWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn most low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), national surveys are the main data source for stillbirths and perinatal mortality. Data quality issues such as under-reporting and misreporting have greatly limited the usefulness of such data. We aimed to enhance the use of mortality data in surveys by proposing data quality metrics and exploring adjustment procedures to obtain the best possible measure of perinatal mortality.

methodsWe performed a population-based analysis of data from 157 demographic and health surveys (DHSs) from 1990 to 2020, with reproductive calendar and birth history data from 53 LMICs. Pregnancies terminated before 7 months' gestation were excluded. We examined data quality and compared survey values with reference values obtained from a literature review to assess misreporting of the age at early neonatal death, omission and transference of stillbirths, and very early neonatal deaths. Real cohort life-table rates of stillbirth, early neonatal, and perinatal mortality per 1000 births were calculated. The underlying risks of stillbirth and daily deaths were modelled using modified Gompertz-Makeham models.

findingsData for 2 008 807 pregnancies of ≥7 months' gestational age were extracted from the reproductive calendar for the analysis period. Age heaping at day 7 occurred in most surveys. The median value for the heaping index of deaths at day 7 was 2·05 (IQR 1·36-2·87). The median ratio of stillbirths to deaths on days 0-1 was 1·15 (0·86-1·51). Of the 157 surveys, 23 (15%) were considered to have plausible ratios, 71 (45%) had probable ratios, and 63 (40%) had improbable ratios. The ratio of deaths on days 0-1 to deaths on days 2-6 varied considerably between surveys and 119 surveys (76%) had ratios of less than 2·4, indicative of under-reporting of very early neonatal deaths in most surveys. The fully adjusted model increased the median stillbirth rates from 12·2 (9·4-15·9) to 25·6 (18·0-33·4) per 1000 births, with a median relative increase of 95·0% (56·6-136·6). The median perinatal mortality rate also increased from 32·6 (23·6-38·3) to 44·8 (32·8-58·0) per 1000 births, with a median relative increase of 47·8% (6·9-61·0).

interpretationA simultaneous focus on stillbirths and early neonatal mortality facilitates a comprehensive assessment of inaccurate reporting in household surveys and allows for better use of surveys in planning and monitoring of efforts to reduce stillbirths and early neonatal mortality.

fundingNone.

Indexed as

Perinatal DeathStillbirthData AccuracyFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHumansInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornPerinatal MortalityPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37167983
PMCPMC10188368
OpenAlexW4376226364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.