Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37167232›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Assessing the aesthetic attractivity of European butterflies: A web-based survey protocol.

Elia van Tongeren, Ginevra Sistri, Vincenzo Zingaro, Alessandro Cini, Leonardo Dapporto, Mariagrazia Portera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elia van TongerenNBFC, National Biodiversity Future Center, Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5253-6582
Ginevra SistriDepartment of Biology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Vincenzo ZingaroDepartment of Humanities and Philosophy, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3259-5857
Alessandro CiniDepartment of Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0355-2188
Leonardo DapportoNBFC, National Biodiversity Future Center, Palermo, Italy.
Mariagrazia PorteraDepartment of Humanities and Philosophy, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3949-8147

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aesthetic attractivity stands as an underestimated yet fundamental feature of species in conservation biology, significantly driving disproportionate protection efforts towards charismatic species. Despite the evidence, few attempts sought to precisely quantify the impact of aesthetic attractivity in defining priority of species for conservation actions (e.g. inclusion in International Union for Conservation of Nature red lists and protection lists). This study protocol describes the setting of an online test (available from April 2022 to April 2023 at www.unveiling.eu) designed to i) quantify the aesthetic attractivity to humans of the 496 European butterfly species and ii) identify which features (both in the perceived animal and in the perceiver) influence the aesthetic attractivity of a given butterfly species. The test is divided in 5 sections (personal data, ranking, single morphological features, emotional engagement, dispositional variables) aimed at profiling the relation each participant has with the species examined. In the long-term, evaluating butterflies' aesthetic attractivity could facilitate the critical assessment of current conservation strategies, such as the process of selection of flag and umbrella species by research institutions, environmental associations and Non Governative Organizations. This is expected to provide the much-needed evidence to set up unbiased biodiversity conservation strategies and counteract the selective anthropogenic pressure which favours the extinction of unattractive species, being no or less protected compared to charismatic species.

Indexed as

ButterfliesEcosystemAnimalsBiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesEstheticsHumansInternet

Identifiers

PMID37167232
PMCPMC10174575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.