Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37167095›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on sexual and reproductive health2023

"I'm going to be forced to have a baby": A study of COVID-19 abortion experiences on Reddit.

Laura Jacques, Taryn Valley, Shimin Zhao, Madison Lands, Natalie Rivera, Jenny A Higgins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. How Women with Endometriosis Use Social Media for Support and Self-Management: An Analysis of Reddit Content.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura JacquesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Taryn ValleyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Shimin ZhaoDepartment of Philosophy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Madison LandsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Natalie RiveraCollaborative for Reproductive Equity (CORE), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Medical Sciences Center 4245, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Jenny A HigginsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Funding

Integrated Training For Physician-ScientistsT32GM140935 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Anna Huttenlocher, Jeniel E Nett · 2021 to 2026
$6.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM140935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe initial stages of the COVID-19 pandemic affected abortion care in the United States (US) in myriad ways. While research has documented systems-level pandemic-related impacts on abortion access and care delivery little information exists about the experiences of abortion seekers during this period. We sought to document the effects of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions US abortion seekers by analyzing posts on Reddit, a popular social media website.

methodsWe compiled and coded 528 anonymous posts on the abortion subreddit from 3/20/2020 to 4/12/2020 and applied inductive qualitative analytic techniques to identify themes.

resultsWe identified four primary themes. First, posters reported several COVID-19-related barriers to abortion services: reduced in-person access due to clinic closures, mail delivery delays of abortion medications, and pandemic-related financial barriers to both self-managed and in-clinic abortion. The second theme encompassed quarantine-driven privacy challenges, primarily challenges with concealing an abortion from household members. Third, posters detailed how the pandemic constrained their pregnancy decision making, including time pressure from impending clinic closures. Finally, posters reported COVID-19-related changes to service delivery that negatively affected their abortion experiences, for example being unable to bring a support person into the clinic due to pandemic visitor restrictions. DISCUSSION: This analysis of real-time social media posts reveals multiple ways that the COVID-19 pandemic limited abortion access in the US and affected abortion seekers' decisions and experiences. Findings shed light on the consequences of sudden changes, whether pandemic or policy related, on abortion service delivery.

Indexed as

Abortion ApplicantsAbortion, InducedCOVID-19Ambulatory Care FacilitiesFemaleHumansPandemicsPregnancyUnited States

Identifiers

PMID37167095
PMCPMC10864016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.