Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37166549›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2023

The mechanical loading of the spine in physical activities.

Robin Schäfer, Katharina Trompeter, Daniela Fett, Kai Heinrich, Johannes Funken, Steffen Willwacher, Gert-Peter Brüggemann, Petra Platen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Robin Schäfer *Department of Sports Medicine and Sports Nutrition, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany. robin.schaefer@rub.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2149-8699
Katharina Trompeter *Department of Sports Medicine and Sports Nutrition, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Daniela Fett *Department of Sports Medicine and Sports Nutrition, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Kai HeinrichInstitute of Biomechanics and Orthopaedics, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Johannes FunkenInstitute of Biomechanics and Orthopaedics, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Steffen WillwacherInstitute of Biomechanics and Orthopaedics, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Gert-Peter BrüggemannInstitute of Biomechanics and Orthopaedics, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Petra PlatenDepartment of Sports Medicine and Sports Nutrition, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
German Sport University Cologne · DERuhr University Bochum · DEHochschule für Gesundheit - University of Applied Sciences · DEUniversity Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo summarize the mechanical loading of the spine in different activities of daily living and sports.

methodsSince the direct measurement is not feasible in sports activities, a mathematical model was applied to quantify spinal loading of more than 600 physical tasks in more than 200 athletes from several sports disciplines. The outcome is compression and torque (normalized to body weight/mass) at L4/L5.

resultsThe data demonstrate high compressive forces on the lumbar spine in sport-related activities, which are much higher than forces reported in normal daily activities and work tasks. Especially ballistic jumping and landing skills yield high estimated compression at L4/L5 of more than ten times body weight. Jumping, landing, heavy lifting and weight training in sports demonstrate compression forces significantly higher than guideline recommendations for working tasks.

conclusionThese results may help to identify acute and long-term risks of low back pain and, thus, may guide the development of preventive interventions for low back pain or injury in athletes.

Indexed as

Low Back PainActivities of Daily LivingBiomechanical PhenomenaBody WeightExerciseHumansLiftingLumbar VertebraeSpineWeight-BearingDynamic physical activitiesLumbar spineMechanical loading

Identifiers

PMID37166549
OpenAlexW4376131872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.