Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37166537›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2023

Ventilatory response to added dead space in infants exposed to second-hand smoke in pregnancy.

Allan Jenkinson, Nadja Bednarczuk, Ourania Kaltsogianni, Emma E Williams, Rebecca Lee, Ravindra Bhat, Theodore Dassios, Anthony D Milner, Anne Greenough

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Allan JenkinsonDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 4th Floor Golden Jubilee Wing, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2667-2190
Nadja BednarczukDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 4th Floor Golden Jubilee Wing, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
Ourania KaltsogianniDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 4th Floor Golden Jubilee Wing, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
Emma E WilliamsDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 4th Floor Golden Jubilee Wing, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6480-468X
Rebecca LeeDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 4th Floor Golden Jubilee Wing, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
Ravindra BhatDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 4th Floor Golden Jubilee Wing, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
Theodore DassiosDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 4th Floor Golden Jubilee Wing, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5258-5301
Anthony D MilnerDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 4th Floor Golden Jubilee Wing, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
Anne GreenoughDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 4th Floor Golden Jubilee Wing, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK. anne.greenough@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8672-5349
King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maternal cigarette smoking in pregnancy can adversely affect infant respiratory control. In utero nicotine exposure has been shown to blunt the infant ventilatory response to hypercapnia, which could increase the risk of sudden infant death syndrome. The potential impact of maternal second-hand smoke exposure, however, has not yet been determined. The aim of this study was to assess ventilatory response to added dead-space (inducing hypercapnia) in infants with second-hand smoke exposure during pregnancy, in infants whose mothers smoked and in controls (non-smoke exposed). Infants breathed through a face mask and specialised "tube-breathing" circuit, incorporating a dead space of 4.4 ml/kg body weight. The maximum minute ventilation (MMV) during added dead space breathing was determined and the time taken to achieve 63% of the MMV calculated (the time constant (TC) of the response). Infants were studied on the postnatal ward prior to discharge home. Thirty infants (ten in each group) were studied with a median gestational age of 39 [range 37-41] weeks, birthweight of 3.1 [2.2-4.0] kg, and postnatal age of 33 (21-62) h. The infants whose mothers had second-hand smoke exposure (median TC 42 s, p = 0.001), and the infants of cigarette smoking mothers (median TC 37 s, p = 0.002) had longer time constants than the controls (median TC 29 s). There was no significant difference between the TC of the infants whose mothers had second-hand smoke exposure and those whose mothers smoked (p = 0.112).    Conclusion: Second-hand smoke exposure during pregnancy was associated with a delayed newborn ventilatory response. What is Known: • Maternal cigarette smoking in pregnancy can adversely affect infant respiratory control. • The potential impact of maternal second-hand smoke exposure, however, has not yet been determined. What is New: • We have assessed the ventilatory response to added dead-space (inducing hypercapnia) in newborns with second-hand smoke exposure during pregnancy, in infants whose mothers smoked, and in controls (non-smoke exposed). • Maternal second-hand smoke exposure, as well as maternal smoking, during pregnancy was associated with a delayed newborn ventilatory response.

Indexed as

Prenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsTobacco Smoke PollutionBirth WeightFemaleHumansHypercapniaInfantInfant, NewbornMothersPregnancyTobacco Smoke PollutionAntenatal smoke exposureMaternal smokingMinute ventilationNicotineRespiratory control

Identifiers

PMID37166537
PMCPMC10354125
OpenAlexW4376132629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.