Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37166495›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Introduction of a breast apparent diffusion coefficient category system (ADC-B) derived from a large multicenter MRI database.

Hubert Bickel, Paola Clauser, Katja Pinker, Thomas Helbich, Iva Biondic, Boris Brkljacic, Matthias Dietzel, Gordana Ivanac, Barbara Krug, Marco Moschetta and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Non-contrast Breast MR Imaging.Radiologic clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Hubert BickelDpt. of Biomedical Imaging and Image Guided Therapy, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Paola ClauserDpt. of Biomedical Imaging and Image Guided Therapy, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Katja PinkerEvelyn H. Lauder Breast Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 East 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Thomas HelbichDpt. of Biomedical Imaging and Image Guided Therapy, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Iva BiondicDpt. of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Dubrava, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Avenija Gojka Šuška 6, 10 000, Zagreb, Croatia.
Boris BrkljacicDpt. of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Dubrava, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Avenija Gojka Šuška 6, 10 000, Zagreb, Croatia.
Matthias DietzelDpt. of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Gordana IvanacDpt. of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Dubrava, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Avenija Gojka Šuška 6, 10 000, Zagreb, Croatia.
Barbara KrugDpt. of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Marco MoschettaDpt. of Emergency and Organ Transplantation-Breast Care Unit, Aldo Moro University of Bari Medical School, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Victor NeuhausDpt. of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Klaus PreidlerDiagnosezentrum Meidling, Meidlinger Hauptstr. 7 - 9, 1120, Vienna, Austria.
Pascal BaltzerDpt. of Biomedical Imaging and Image Guided Therapy, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. pascal.baltzer@meduniwien.ac.at.
Medical University of Vienna · ATUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity of Zagreb · HRMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEUniversity Hospital Dubrava · HRUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop an intuitive and generally applicable system for the reporting, assessment, and documentation of ADC to complement standard BI-RADS criteria.

methodsThis was a multicentric, retrospective analysis of 11 independently conducted institutional review board-approved studies from seven institutions performed between 2007 and 2019. Breast Apparent Diffusion coefficient (ADC-B) categories comprised ADC-B0 (ADC non-diagnostic), ADC-B1 (no enhancing lesion), and ADC-B2-5. The latter was defined by plotting ADC versus cumulative malignancy rates. Statistics comprised ANOVA with post hoc testing and ROC analysis. p values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

resultsA total of 1625 patients (age: 55.9 years (± 13.8)) with 1736 pathologically verified breast lesions were included. The mean ADC (× 10

conclusionsThe breast apparent diffusion coefficient system (ADC-B) provides a simple and widely applicable categorization scheme for assessment, documentation, and reporting of apparent diffusion coefficient values in contrast-enhancing breast lesions on MRI. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The ADC-B system, based on diverse MRI examinations, is clinically relevant for stratifying breast cancer risk via apparent diffusion coefficient measurements, and complements BI-RADS for improved clinical decision-making and patient outcomes. KEY POINTS: • The breast apparent diffusion coefficient category system (ADC-B) is a simple tool for the assessment, documentation, and reporting of ADC values in contrast-enhancing breast lesions on MRI. • The categories comprise ADC-B0 for non-diagnostic examinations, ADC-B1 for examinations without an enhancing lesion, and ADC-B2-5 for enhancing lesions with an increasing malignancy rate. • The breast apparent diffusion coefficient category system may be used to complement BI-RADS in clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsContrast MediaBreastDiagnosis, DifferentialDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityContrast MediaBreast neoplasmsClassificationDiffusion magnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID37166495
PMCPMC10326122
OpenAlexW4376131530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.