ArticleEuropean journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine2023
Postural alterations in breast cancer survivors: proposal of the PABS evaluation protocol based on a systematic review.
Article in European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- From RGB-D to RGB-Only: Reliability and Clinical Relevance of Markerless Skeletal Tracking for Postural Assessment in Parkinson's Disease.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Assessment of gait patterns in breast cancer survivors: a cross-sectional study.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe constant improvement of the diagnostic process and the crescent efficacy of treatment options for Breast Cancer have led to an increase in the survival rate of patients. Thereby, it has become fundamental for Breast Care Units to deal with short-, medium-, and long-term sequelae of the disease and its treatment. Among these, changes in posture seem to have a crucial role. This review aims to collect and summarize the current knowledge on postural disorders in Breast Cancer Survivors, focusing on evaluation methods and rehabilitation protocols. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic research was conducted on PubMed, Scopus and World of Science databases, considering all the studies published up to 2021. Case reports, case series, cross-sectional, retrospective and prospective studies were included. Narrative and Systematic reviews were excluded. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: After applying the eligibility criteria and bibliographic expansion, 55 articles were selected. Forty-four studies focused on the analysis and the quantification of postural abnormalities, showing a huge variability in population characteristics, valuative methods and outcome measures. Most of them are cross-sectional studies. Rehabilitation treatments have been considered in only 12 studies: all the rehabilitative treatments proved to be effective but, the heterogeneity among the evaluation methods has made a comparison impossible. Hence, we designed a complete evaluation protocol for the assessment of postural abnormalities in Breast Cancer Survivors. Our protocol has been drawn following the structure of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.
conclusionsOur review pointed out the crescent interest of the current Literature on analysis and treatment of postural alterations in breast cancer survivors. Since the extreme variety of outcome measures made it impossible to give a clear indication for evaluation and treatment of this disorder, we designed a complete evaluation protocol for the assessment of postural abnormalities in breast cancer survivors, with the goal of guiding the design of new clinical trials on these subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.