Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37166416›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2023

A combined radiomic model distinguishing GISTs from leiomyomas and schwannomas in the stomach based on endoscopic ultrasonography images.

Xian-Da Zhang, Ling Zhang, Ting-Ting Gong, Zhuo-Ran Wang, Kang-Li Guo, Jun Li, Yuan Chen, Jian-Tao Zhang, Ben-Gong Ye, Jin Ding and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Xian-Da ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9881-4111
Ling ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ting-Ting GongDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zhuo-Ran WangShanghai Key Laboratory of Multidimensional Information Processing, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Kang-Li GuoDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Jun LiDepartment of Digestive Endoscopy Center, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yuan ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China.
Jian-Tao ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, First Hospital of Hanbin District, Ankang, Shaanxi, China.
Ben-Gong YeDepartment of Gastroenterology, First Hospital of Hanbin District, Ankang, Shaanxi, China.
Jin DingDepartment of Gastroenterology, Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China.
Jian-Wei ZhuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Feng LiuDepartment of Digestive Endoscopy Center, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Duan-Min HuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
JianGang ChenShanghai Key Laboratory of Multidimensional Information Processing, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Chun-Hua ZhouDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2351-578X
Duo-Wu ZouDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2461-5304

Funding

Science and Education Revitalize Health, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China KJXW2019013Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 21S31903500Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 21Y11908100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is recommended as the best tool for evaluating gastric subepithelial lesions (SELs); nonetheless, it has difficulty distinguishing gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) from leiomyomas and schwannomas. GISTs have malignant potential, whereas leiomyomas and schwannomas are considered benign. PURPOSE: This study aimed to establish a combined radiomic model based on EUS images for distinguishing GISTs from leiomyomas and schwannomas in the stomach.

methodsEUS images of pathologically confirmed GISTs, leiomyomas, and schwannomas were collected from five centers. Gastric SELs were divided into training and testing datasets based on random split-sample method (7:3). Radiomic features were extracted from the tumor and muscularis propria regions. Principal component analysis, least absolute shrinkage, and selection operator were used for feature selection. Support vector machine was used to construct radiomic models. Two radiomic models were built: the conventional radiomic model included tumor features alone, whereas the combined radiomic model incorporated features from the tumor and muscularis propria regions.

resultsA total of 3933 EUS images from 485 cases were included. For the differential diagnosis of GISTs from leiomyomas and schwannomas, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 74.5%, 72.2%, 78.7%, and 0.754, respectively, for the EUS experts; 76.8%, 74.4%, 81.0%, and 0.830, respectively, for the conventional radiomic model; and 90.9%, 91.0%, 90.6%, and 0.953, respectively, for the combined radiomic model. For gastric SELs <20 mm, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the combined radiomic model were 91.4%, 91.6%, 91.1%, and 0.960, respectively.

conclusionsWe developed and validated a combined radiomic model to distinguish gastric GISTs from leiomyomas and schwannomas. The combined radiomic model showed better diagnostic performance than the conventional radiomic model and could assist EUS experts in non-invasively diagnosing gastric SELs, particularly gastric SELs <20 mm.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal Stromal TumorsLeiomyomaNeurilemmomaStomach NeoplasmsEndosonographyHumansStomachendoscopic ultrasonographygastrointestinal stromal tumorsradiomicsstomachsubepithelial lesion

Identifiers

PMID37166416
PMCPMC10338752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.