Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37166406›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2023

Students' interaction anxiety and social phobia in interprofessional education in Hong Kong: mapping a new research direction.

Fraide A Ganotice, Xiaoai Shen, Jacqueline Kwan Yuk Yuen, Yin Man Amy Chow, Anita M Y Wong, Karen M K Chan, Binbin Zheng, Linda Chan, Pauline Yeung Ng, Siu Chung Leung and 36 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

46 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fraide A GanoticeBau Institute of Medical and Health Sciences Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0003-3139-9926
Xiaoai ShenBau Institute of Medical and Health Sciences Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Jacqueline Kwan Yuk YuenDepartment of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Yin Man Amy ChowDepartment of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Anita M Y WongFaculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Karen M K ChanFaculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-7114-5739
Binbin ZhengBau Institute of Medical and Health Sciences Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Linda ChanBau Institute of Medical and Health Sciences Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-9802-5059
Pauline Yeung NgDepartment of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Siu Chung LeungEmergency Medicine Unit, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0003-0169-9899
Elizabeth BarrettFaculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Hoi Yan Celia ChanDepartment of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Wing Nga ChanSchool of Nursing and Health Studies, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Hong Kong.
Kit Wa Sherry ChanDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0003-2712-5826
Siu Ling Polly ChanSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-8198-9302
So Ching Sarah ChanBau Institute of Medical and Health Sciences Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Esther W Y ChanDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Yuet Ying Jessica CheukSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Jacky ChoyDepartment of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Qing HeBau Institute of Medical and Health Sciences Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Julienne JenDepartment of Professional Legal Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Jingwen JinDepartment of Psychology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Ui Soon KhooDepartment of Pathology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0003-2200-7505
Ho Yan Angie LamSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-7534-9034
May P S LamDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Yik Wa LawDepartment of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0001-5165-8193
Jetty Chung Yung LeeFaculty of Science, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Feona Chung Yin LeungSchool of Chinese Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Ann LeungDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Rebecca K W LiuBau Institute of Medical and Health Sciences Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Vivian Wei Qun LouDepartment of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0001-7000-1306
Pauline LukBau Institute of Medical and Health Sciences Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Zoe Lai Han NgSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Alina Yee Man NgSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Maggie Wai Ming PunSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Mary Lok Man SeeSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Jiangang ShenSchool of Chinese Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Grace Pui Yuk SzetoSchool of Medical and Health Sciences, Tung Wah College, Hong Kong.
Eliza Y T TamDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Winnie Wan Yee TsoDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-5859-015X
Ning WangSchool of Chinese Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Runjia WangBau Institute of Medical and Health Sciences Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Janet Kit Ting WongDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-3000-4577
Janet Yuen Ha WongSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Grace Wai Yee YuenSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
George Lim TipoeBau Institute of Medical and Health Sciences Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-2603-0625
University of Hong Kong · HKChinese University of Hong Kong · HKTung Wah College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterprofessional education (IPE) has been promoted as a breakthrough in healthcare because of the impact when professionals work as a team. However, despite its inception dating back to the 1960s, its science has taken a long time to advance. There is a need to theorize IPE to cultivate creative insights for a nuanced understanding of IPE. This study aims to propose a research agenda on social interaction by understanding the measurement scales used and guiding researchers to contribute to the discussion of social processes in IPE.

methodThis quantitative research was undertaken in a cross-institutional IPE involving 925 healthcare students (Medicine, Nursing, Social Work, Chinese Medicine, Pharmacy, Speech Language Pathology, Clinical Psychology, Food and Nutritional Science and Physiotherapy) from two institutions in Hong Kong. Participants completed the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS-6) and Social Phobia Scale (SPS-6). We applied a construct validation approach: within-network and between-network validation. We performed confirmatory factors analysis, t-test, analysis of variance and regression analysis.

resultsCFA results indicated that current data fit the a priori model providing support to within-network validity [RMSEA=.08, NFI=.959, CFI=.965, IFI=.965, TLI=.955]. The criteria for acceptable fit were met. The scales were invariant between genders, across year levels and disciplines. Results indicated that social interaction anxiety and social phobia negatively predicted behavioural engagement (

conclusionsOur data provided support for the validity of the scales when used among healthcare students in Hong Kong. SIAS-6 and SPS-6 have sound psychometric properties based on students' data in Hong Kong. We identified quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research designs to guide researchers in getting involved in the discussion of students' social interactions in IPE.Key MessagesThe Social Anxiety Scale (SIAS-6) and Social Phobia Scale (SPS-6) scales have sound psychometric properties based on the large-scale healthcare students' data in IPE in Hong Kong.Social interaction anxiety and social phobia negatively predicted students' behavioural engagement with IPE and positively predicted behavioural disaffection. The scales are invariant in terms of gender, year level and discipline.Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are proposed to aid researchers to contribute in healthcare education literature using the SIAS-6 and SPS-6.

Indexed as

Phobia, SocialAnxietyFemaleHong KongHumansInterprofessional EducationInterprofessional RelationsMaleStudentsConstruct validationinterprofessional educationsocial interaction anxiety

Identifiers

PMID37166406
PMCPMC10177675
OpenAlexW4376132340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.