Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37165945›Full record

ArticleAdvanced healthcare materials2023

Spatial Confinement Modulates Macrophage Response in Microporous Annealed Particle (MAP) Scaffolds.

Yining Liu, Alejandra Suarez-Arnedo, Lindsay Riley, Tasman Miley, Jingyi Xia, Tatiana Segura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced healthcare materials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Engineering Efferocytosis for Bone Regeneration.Macromolecular bioscience · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yining LiuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Duke University, 101 Science Drive, Campus Box 90281, Durham, NC, 27708-0281, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0697-0396
Alejandra Suarez-ArnedoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Duke University, 101 Science Drive, Campus Box 90281, Durham, NC, 27708-0281, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9235-0910
Lindsay RileyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Duke University, 101 Science Drive, Campus Box 90281, Durham, NC, 27708-0281, USA.
Tasman MileyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Duke University, 101 Science Drive, Campus Box 90281, Durham, NC, 27708-0281, USA.
Jingyi XiaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Duke University, 101 Science Drive, Campus Box 90281, Durham, NC, 27708-0281, USA.
Tatiana SeguraDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Duke University, 101 Science Drive, Campus Box 90281, Durham, NC, 27708-0281, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1569-8686

Funding

Engineering Adaptive Immune Responses from Hydrogel Scaffolds to Promote Tissue RegenerationR01AI152568 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI COLLIER, JOEL H, SEGURA, TATIANA · 2020 to 2024
$3.2M
University Training Program in Biomolecular and Tissue EngineeringT32GM144291 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Charles A. Gersbach, Tatiana Segura · 2022 to 2026
$2.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI152568NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM144291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macrophages are essential in the initiation, maintenance, and transition of inflammatory processes such as foreign body response and wound healing. Mounting evidence suggests that physical factors also modulate macrophage activation. 2D in vitro systems demonstrate that constraining macrophages to small areas or channels modulates their phenotypes and changes their responses to known inflammatory agents such as lipopolysaccharide. However, how dimensionality and pore size affect macrophage phenotype is less explored. In this work, the change in macrophage M1/M2 polarization when confined in microporous annealed particle (MAP) scaffolds is studied. Particles sizes (40, 70, and 130 µm) are selected using outputs from software LOVAMAP that analyzes the characteristics of 3D pores in MAP gels. As the size of building block particle correlates with pore size inside the scaffolds, the three  types of scaffold allow us to study how the degree of spatial confinement modulates the behavior of embedded macrophages. Spatially confining macrophages in scaffolds with pore size on the scale of cells leads to a reduced level of the inflammatory response, which is correlated with a change in cell morphology and motility.

Indexed as

MacrophagesTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsWound HealingBiocompatible Materialsbiomaterialsgranular materialsmacrophageporosityspatial confinement

Identifiers

PMID37165945
PMCPMC10592513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.