Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37165943›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2023

A multistate modeling and simulation framework to learn dose-response of oncology drugs: Application to bintrafusp alfa in non-small cell lung cancer.

Han Liu, Ana-Marija Milenković-Grišić, Sreenath M Krishnan, Siv Jönsson, Lena E Friberg, Pascal Girard, Karthik Venkatakrishnan, Yulia Vugmeyster, Akash Khandelwal, Mats O Karlsson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A tutorial on pharmacometric Markov models.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Han LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4476-2253
Ana-Marija Milenković-GrišićMerck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1093-6879
Sreenath M KrishnanDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5051-7556
Siv JönssonDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8240-0865
Lena E FribergDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2979-679X
Pascal GirardMerck Institute of Pharmacometrics, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Karthik VenkatakrishnanEMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc., an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA.
Yulia VugmeysterEMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc., an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA.
Akash KhandelwalMerck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0472-7173
Mats O KarlssonDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1258-8297
Uppsala University · SEMerck (Germany) · DEOno Pharmaceutical (United States) · USMerck Serono (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

Merck KGaASwedish Cancer Society 20 1226 PjF
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dose/exposure-efficacy analyses are often conducted separately for oncology end points like best overall response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Multistate models offer to bridge these dose-end point relationships by describing transitions and transition times from enrollment to response, progression, and death, and evaluating transition-specific dose effects. This study aims to apply the multistate pharmacometric modeling and simulation framework in a dose optimization setting of bintrafusp alfa, a fusion protein targeting TGF-β and PD-L1. A multistate model with six states (stable disease [SD], response, progression, unknown, dropout, and death) was developed to describe the totality of endpoints data (time to response, PFS, and OS) of 80 patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving 500 or 1200 mg of bintrafusp alfa. Besides dose, evaluated predictor of transitions include time, demographics, premedication, disease factors, individual clearance derived from a pharmacokinetic model, and tumor dynamic metrics observed or derived from tumor size model. We found that probabilities of progression and death upon progression decreased over time since enrollment. Patients with metastasis at baseline had a higher probability to progress than patients without metastasis had. Despite dose failed to be statistically significant for any individual transition, the combined effect quantified through a model with dose-specific transition estimates was still informative. Simulations predicted a 69.2% probability of at least 1 month longer, and, 55.6% probability of at least 2-months longer median OS from the 1200 mg compared to the 500 mg dose, supporting the selection of 1200 mg for future studies.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsB7-H1 AntigenComputer SimulationHumansProbabilityProgression-Free SurvivalB7-H1 Antigen

Identifiers

PMID37165943
PMCPMC10681430
OpenAlexW4376131178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.