Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37165539›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2023

De novo protein design by inversion of the AlphaFold structure prediction network.

Casper A Goverde, Benedict Wolf, Hamed Khakzad, Stéphane Rosset, Bruno E Correia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Limitations of the refolding pipeline for de novo protein design.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Protein engineering: status report.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2026
    Review
  10. Assessing the validity of leucine zipper constructs predicted by AlphaFold.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  11. Protein Structure Prediction Methods.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Design of proteins by parallel tempering in the sequence space.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Efficient generation of epitope-targetedbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Casper A GoverdeÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0004-7409-4705
Benedict WolfÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0003-5688-3607
Hamed KhakzadÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Stéphane RossetÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Bruno E CorreiaÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7377-8636

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

De novo protein design enhances our understanding of the principles that govern protein folding and interactions, and has the potential to revolutionize biotechnology through the engineering of novel protein functionalities. Despite recent progress in computational design strategies, de novo design of protein structures remains challenging, given the vast size of the sequence-structure space. AlphaFold2 (AF2), a state-of-the-art neural network architecture, achieved remarkable accuracy in predicting protein structures from amino acid sequences. This raises the question whether AF2 has learned the principles of protein folding sufficiently for de novo design. Here, we sought to answer this question by inverting the AF2 network, using the prediction weight set and a loss function to bias the generated sequences to adopt a target fold. Initial design trials resulted in de novo designs with an overrepresentation of hydrophobic residues on the protein surface compared to their natural protein family, requiring additional surface optimization. In silico validation of the designs showed protein structures with the correct fold, a hydrophilic surface and a densely packed hydrophobic core. In vitro validation showed that 7 out of 39 designs were folded and stable in solution with high melting temperatures. In summary, our design workflow solely based on AF2 does not seem to fully capture basic principles of de novo protein design, as observed in the protein surface's hydrophobic vs. hydrophilic patterning. However, with minimal post-design intervention, these pipelines generated viable sequences as assessed experimental characterization. Thus, such pipelines show the potential to contribute to solving outstanding challenges in de novo protein design.

Indexed as

FurylfuramideProtein EngineeringAmino Acid SequenceProtein FoldingProteinsFurylfuramideProteinsAlphaFold2computational structural biologyDe novo protein designmachine learningstructure prediction network inversion

Identifiers

PMID37165539
PMCPMC10204179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.