Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37165468›Full record

ReviewmAbs

Engaging natural killer cells for cancer therapy via NKG2D, CD16A and other receptors.

Kerry A Whalen, Kavya Rakhra, Naveen K Mehta, Alexander Steinle, Jennifer S Michaelson, Patrick A Baeuerle

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in mAbs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kerry A WhalenPreclinical and Early Development, Cullinan Oncology, Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Kavya RakhraPreclinical and Early Development, Cullinan Oncology, Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Naveen K MehtaPreclinical and Early Development, Cullinan Oncology, Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Alexander SteinleInstitute for Molecular Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Jennifer S MichaelsonPreclinical and Early Development, Cullinan Oncology, Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Patrick A BaeuerlePreclinical and Early Development, Cullinan Oncology, Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of immuno-oncology has revolutionized cancer patient care and improved survival and quality of life for patients. Much of the focus in the field has been on exploiting the power of the adaptive immune response through therapeutic targeting of T cells. While these approaches have markedly advanced the field, some challenges remain, and the clinical benefit of T cell therapies does not extend to all patients or tumor indications. Alternative strategies, such as engaging the innate immune system, have become an intense area of focus in the field. In particular, the engagement of natural killer (NK) cells as potent effectors of the innate immune response has emerged as a promising modality in immunotherapy. Here, we review therapeutic approaches for selective engagement of NK cells for cancer therapy, with a particular focus on targeting the key activating receptors NK Group 2D (NKG2D) and cluster of differentiation 16A (CD16A).

Indexed as

NeoplasmsNK Cell Lectin-Like Receptor Subfamily KHumansImmunotherapyKiller Cells, NaturalQuality of LifeNK Cell Lectin-Like Receptor Subfamily KADCCCD16AMICAMICBmonoclonal antibodyNK cellNKG2D

Identifiers

PMID37165468
PMCPMC10173799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.