Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37165429›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

Perspectives on consciousness in patients with disorders of consciousness from brain injury: group concept mapping study across clinic, research, and families.

Niklas Blond, Lise Marie Andersen, Eva Elisabeth Wæhrens, Mette Terp Høybye

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Niklas BlondInteracting Minds Centre, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Jens Chr. Skous Vej 4, Aarhus C, DK- 8000, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2816-263X
Lise Marie AndersenCenter for Elective Surgery, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8928-6401
Eva Elisabeth WæhrensThe Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0846-1659
Mette Terp HøybyeInteracting Minds Centre, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Jens Chr. Skous Vej 4, Aarhus C, DK- 8000, Denmark. hoybye@clin.au.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6914-2697
Aarhus University · DKRegionshospitalet Silkeborg · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

Carlsbergfondet CF18-0817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn effective healthcare system depends on clinic, research, and patient/relatives interactions. Such interactions may at their core be challenged by misalignments of concepts and the practices that constitute them. The concept of consciousness and what is experienced and understood as signs of consciousness in patients with severe acquired brain injury is one of these potential areas of misalignment. Different perspectives and experiences of consciousness are challenging the delivery of care and the high-stake decision-making process on the potential withdrawal of treatment. The enhanced uncertainties call for reflections on how key stakeholders perceive and identify consciousness in current clinical encounters and practice.

methodsThe study empirically explores the actual experiences and conceptions of consciousness concerning patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) from the perspectives of researchers, health professionals, and relatives of patients, to understand the challenges of the diversity of understandings of consciousness. Engaging the stakeholders by employing Group Concept Mapping methodology, the study developed a situated conceptual map, which reflects nuances and the importance of perspectives on and signs of consciousness.

resultsTwenty-seven participants contributed to the generation of ideas, 14 took part in the structuring of statements and 10 took part in the validation meeting to interpret the cluster rating map. A total of 85 unique statements were identified and organized into six clusters: (1) Presence, (2) Intentional Activity, (3) Experience of self, (4) Participation in Social Interaction, (5) (Repeated) Response, and (6) Unspecific Reaction. The conceptual mapping demonstrates an extensive overlap in perspectives on consciousness among participants, prioritizing signs that are observable at the bedside.

conclusionsThe study provides a first step toward a future framework for the difficult process of decision-making concerning a segment of patients with DoC. The study highlights the importance of repeatable signs of consciousness observed at the bedside and the patient's ability to participate in social interactions, while also considering the importance of non-clinically observable signs of consciousness.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesConsciousness DisordersConsciousnessHealth PersonnelHumansPatientsBrain injuryDisorders of consciousnessGroup Concept MappingStakeholder involvement

Identifiers

PMID37165429
PMCPMC10173477
OpenAlexW4376133713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.