Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37165412›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2023

Association between use of antihypertensive drugs and the risk of cancer: a population-based cohort study in Shanghai.

Suna Wang, Li Xie, Jianlin Zhuang, Ying Qian, Guanglu Zhang, Xiaowei Quan, Lei Li, Herbert Yu, Weituo Zhang, Wensui Zhao and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Current Status of Research on Losartan in Tumour Therapy.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Suna Wang *School of Public Health and Hongqiao International Institute of Medicine, Shanghai Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, NO.720 Xianxia Road, Changning District, Shanghai, 200050, China.
Li Xie *School of Public Health and Hongqiao International Institute of Medicine, Shanghai Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, NO.720 Xianxia Road, Changning District, Shanghai, 200050, China.
Jianlin Zhuang *Shanghai Changning District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, NO. 39, Yunwushan Road, Changning District, Shanghai, 2000040, China.
Ying QianSchool of Public Health and Hongqiao International Institute of Medicine, Shanghai Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, NO.720 Xianxia Road, Changning District, Shanghai, 200050, China.
Guanglu ZhangSchool of Public Health and Hongqiao International Institute of Medicine, Shanghai Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, NO.720 Xianxia Road, Changning District, Shanghai, 200050, China.
Xiaowei QuanSchool of Public Health and Hongqiao International Institute of Medicine, Shanghai Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, NO.720 Xianxia Road, Changning District, Shanghai, 200050, China.
Lei LiClinical Research Center, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200127, China.
Herbert YuCancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, 701 Ilalo Street, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA.
Weituo ZhangSchool of Public Health and Hongqiao International Institute of Medicine, Shanghai Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, NO.720 Xianxia Road, Changning District, Shanghai, 200050, China. zhangweituo@sjtu.edu.cn.
Wensui ZhaoShanghai Changning District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, NO. 39, Yunwushan Road, Changning District, Shanghai, 2000040, China. zhaowensui@126.com.
Biyun QianSchool of Public Health and Hongqiao International Institute of Medicine, Shanghai Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, NO.720 Xianxia Road, Changning District, Shanghai, 200050, China. qianbiyun@sjtu.edu.cn.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNTongren Hospital · CNCancer Center of Hawaii · USShanghai Changning Mental Health Center · CNShanghai Children's Medical Center · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81573231, 81903417Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 21XD1402600, 22YF1421200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreviously studies shown a potential risk of antihypertensive medicines in relation to cancer susceptibility, which creating significant debate in the scientific community and public concern. We sought to investigate the relationship between antihypertensive medicines and cancer risk, by drug type and class.

methodsWe conducted a population-based cohort study and enrolled patients diagnosed with hypertension from community healthcare centers in Changning District, Shanghai, China. Antihypertensive drug administration were classified as five common antihypertensive drugs. The main outcomes were incidence of total cancer and by major cancer type.

resultsBetween January 2013 and December 2017, a total of 101,370 hypertensive patients were enrolled in this cohort. During a mean follow-up of 5.1 (SD 1.3) years, 4970 cancer cases were newly diagnosed in the cohort. CCBs were the most frequently used antihypertensives which were associated with a moderately increased risk of total cancer (hazard ratio, HR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.05-1.18). The second commonly used drug ARBs were also associated with increased risk of total cancer (HR = 1.10, 95%CI: 1.03-1.17) as well as lung and thyroid cancers (HR = 1.21, 95%CI: 1.05-1.39; HR = 1.62 95%CI: 1.18-2.21, respectively). No significant association was found between cancer and other antihypertensives. Hypertensive patients who use more than one class of antihypertensives drugs had a higher risk of total cancer (HR: 1.22, 95%CI: 1.10-1.35 for two classes; HR: 1.22, 95%CI: 1.03-1.45 for three or more classes), and a possible dose-response relationship was suggested (P for trend < 0.001). The risk of thyroid cancer was higher in hypertensive patients prescribed with three or more antihypertensive classes.

conclusionsUse of ARBs or CCBs may be associated with an increased risk of total cancer. Taking more than one class of antihypertensives drugs appeared to have a higher risk for total cancer.

Indexed as

HypertensionThyroid NeoplasmsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsCalcium Channel BlockersChinaCohort StudiesHumansAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsCalcium Channel BlockersAntihypertensive drugsCancer riskCohort studyElectronic health recordsIncidence

Identifiers

PMID37165412
PMCPMC10173582
OpenAlexW4376133588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.