ArticlePurinergic signalling2024
Identifiability of enzyme kinetic parameters in substrate competition: a case study of CD39/NTPDase1.
Article in Purinergic signalling, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
CD39 (NTPDase1-nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 1) is a membrane-tethered ectonucleotidase that hydrolyzes extracellular ATP to ADP and ADP to AMP. This enzyme is expressed in a variety of cell types and tissues and has broadly been recognized within vascular tissue to have a protective role in converting "danger" ligands (ATP) into neutral ligands (AMP). In this study, we investigate the enzyme kinetics of CD39 using a Michaelis-Menten modeling framework. We show how the unique situation of having a reaction product also serving as a substrate (ADP) complicates the determination of the governing kinetic parameters. Model simulations using values for the kinetic parameters reported in the literature do not align with corresponding time-series data. This dissonance is explained by CD39 kinetic parameters previously being determined by graphical/linearization methods, which have been shown to distort the underlying error structure and lead to inaccurate parameter estimates. Modern methods of estimating these kinetic parameters using nonlinear least squares are still challenging due to unidentifiable parameter interactions. We propose a workflow to accurately determine these parameters by isolating the ADPase and ATPase reactions and estimating the respective ADPase parameters and ATPase parameters with independent data sets. Theoretically, this ensures all kinetic parameters are identifiable and reliable for future prospective model simulations involving CD39. These kinds of mathematical models can be used to understand how circulating purinergic nucleotides affect disease etiology and potentially inform the development of corresponding therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.