Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37165284›Full record

ArticleThe ultrasound journal2023

Femoral vein pulsatility: a simple tool for venous congestion assessment.

V Bhardwaj, P Rola, A Denault, G Vikneswaran, R Spiegel

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ultrasound journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07438015 (VEXUS-REA), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07438015 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

VEXUS-REA : Evaluation of Ultrasound Parameters of Venous Congestion in Patients in a Medical Intensive Care Unit

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de BesanconRan2026 to 2026Enrolled525ConditionsVenous CongestionArmsVenous ultrasound (inferior vena cava, portal vein, suprahepatic vein, and renal vein to calculate the VEXUS score, femoral vein and popliteal vein)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Fluid tolerance in septic shock: Femoral vein pulsatility versus VExUS score in a cross-sectional study.The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

V BhardwajCritical Care, Narayana Health City, Bangalore, India. vmlbhardwaj@yahoo.co.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4273-2771
P RolaICU Chief of Service, Santa Cabrini Hospital, Montreal, Canada.
A DenaultDepartment of Anesthesiology, Monteal Heart Institute, Montreal, Canada.
G VikneswaranClinical Research, Narayana Health City, Bangalore, India.
R SpiegelDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFemoral vein Doppler (FVD) is simpler than the VExUS score which is a multimodal scoring system based on combination of IVC diameter, hepatic venous Doppler, portal vein pulsatility and renal vein Doppler, may be useful in assessing right ventricular overload and signs of venous congestion. There is limited data on the relationship between FVD and VExUS score.

resultsAdult post-cardiac surgery patients were assessed for venous congestion using the VExUS score and FVD. Agreement between VExUS and FVD was studied using Kappa test, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for VExUS and FVD was calculated keeping CVP as gold standard. In total, 107 patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 55.67 ± 12.76. The accuracy of VExUS and FVD for detecting venous congestion was 80.37 (95% CI of 71.5 to 87.4) and 74.7 (95% CI of 65.4 to 82.6), respectively. The level of agreement between FVD and VExUS was moderate (Kappa value of 0.62, P < 0.001) while the agreement between FVD and CVP was weak (Kappa value of 0.49, P < 0.001).

conclusionFVD has good accuracy for detecting venous congestion and shows moderate agreement with VExUS grading. With potentially easier physical accessibility and a shorter learning curve for novices, it may be a simple and valuable tool for assessing venous congestion.

Indexed as

Central venous pressureFluid managementMonitoringVenous congestionVExUS

Identifiers

PMID37165284
PMCPMC10172460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.