Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37165111›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2023

Barriers and facilitators to effective cervical cancer screening in Belize: a qualitative analysis.

Avni Mittal, Shane S Neibart, Abha Kulkarni, Taylor Anderson, Shawna V Hudson, Natalia Largaespada Beer, Mark H Einstein, Racquel E Kohler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Avni Mittal *Department of Obstetrics and Reproductive Health and Gynecology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
Shane S Neibart *Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. sneibart@partners.org.
Abha KulkarniRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Taylor AndersonUniversity of Queensland Ochsner Clinical School, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Shawna V HudsonRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Natalia Largaespada BeerMinistry of Health, Belmopan, Belize.
Mark H EinsteinDepartment of Obstetrics and Reproductive Health and Gynecology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
Racquel E KohlerDepartment of Cancer Prevention and Control, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

Funding

New Jersey Alliance for Clinical Translational Science: NJ ACTSUL1TR003017 · NCATS · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL/HEALTH SCIENCES-RBHS · PI PANETTIERI, REYNOLD ALEXANDER · 2019 to 2023
$28.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBelize has among the highest cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates of Latin American and Caribbean countries. This study evaluates the perspectives of key stakeholders for cervical cancer screening in Belize and identifies the barriers and facilitators for providing equitable access to prevention services.

methodsSemi-structured interviews discussing cervical cancer screening were conducted with key stakeholders across the six districts of Belize in 2018. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed thematically; themes were organized by levels of the social-ecological model.

resultsWe conducted 47 interviews with health care providers (45%), administrators (17%), government officials (25%), and other stakeholders (13%). Majority (78%) of interviews were from the public sector. Perceived barriers to cervical cancer screening were identified across multiple levels: (1) Individual Patient: potential delays in Pap smear results and fear of a cancer diagnosis; (2) Provider: competing clinician responsibilities; (3) Organizational: insufficient space and training; (4) Community: reduced accessibility in rural areas; and (5) Policy: equipment and staffing budget limitations. The main facilitators we identified included the following: (1) at the Community level: resource-sharing between public and private sectors and dedicated rural outreach personnel; (2) at the Policy level: free public screening services and the establishment of population-based screening.

conclusionDespite free, publicly available cervical cancer screening in Belize, complex barriers affect access and completion of management when abnormal screening tests are identified. Provider workload, education outreach, and additional funding for training and facilities are potential areas for strengthening this program and increasing detection and management for cervical cancer control.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsBelizeEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMass ScreeningQualitative ResearchBelizeCervical cancerPreventionQualitative

Identifiers

PMID37165111
PMCPMC10267283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.