Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37165103›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2024

Australian public perspectives on genomic data governance: responsibility, regulation, and logistical considerations.

Fiona Lynch, Yan Meng, Stephanie Best, Ilias Goranitis, Julian Savulescu, Christopher Gyngell, Danya F Vears

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Solving medical mysteries with genomics.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fiona LynchMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6386-6739
Yan MengThe University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Stephanie BestThe University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1107-8976
Ilias GoranitisMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7946-8324
Julian SavulescuMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1691-6403
Christopher GyngellMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1340-3947
Danya F VearsMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia. danya.vears@mcri.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-6290-545X

Funding

Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 76749Department of Health, State Government of Victoria (Victorian Department of Health) N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic sequencing generates huge volumes of data, which may be collected or donated to form large genomic databases. Such information can be stored for future use, either for the data donor themselves or by researchers to help improve our understanding of the genetic basis of disease. Creating datasets of this magnitude and diversity is only possible if patients, their families, and members of the public worldwide share their data. However, there is no consensus on the best technical approach to data sharing that also minimises risks to individuals and exploration of stakeholders' views on aspects of genomic data governance models-the ways genomic data is stored, managed, shared and used-has been minimal. To address this need, we conducted focus groups with 39 members of the Australian public exploring their views and preferences for different aspects of genomic data governance models. We found that consent and control were essential to participants, as they wanted the option to choose who had access to their data and for what purposes. Critically, participants wanted a trustworthy body to enforce regulation of data storage, sharing and usage. While participants recognised the importance of data accessibility, they also expressed a strong desire for data security. Finally, financial responsibility for data storage raised concerns for inequity as well as organisations and individuals using data in ethically contentious ways to generate profit. Our findings highlight some of the trade-offs that need to be considered in the development of genomic data governance systems.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityGenomicsAustraliaFocus GroupsHumansInformation Dissemination

Identifiers

PMID37165103
PMCPMC10923910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.