Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37165074›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

A nursing care-sensitive patient satisfaction measure in older patients.

Margarida Goes, Henrique Oliveira, Manuel Lopes, César Fonseca, Lara Pinho, Maria Marques

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Margarida GoesComprehensive Health Research Center, Universidade de Évora, Évora, Portugal.
Henrique OliveiraInstituto de Telecomunicações, Aveiro, Portugal. hjmo@lx.it.pt.
Manuel LopesComprehensive Health Research Center, Universidade de Évora, Évora, Portugal.
César FonsecaComprehensive Health Research Center, Universidade de Évora, Évora, Portugal.
Lara PinhoComprehensive Health Research Center, Universidade de Évora, Évora, Portugal.
Maria MarquesComprehensive Health Research Center, Universidade de Évora, Évora, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a novelty, this article proposes the empirical operationalization of an indicator sensitive to nursing care called patient satisfaction based on functional capacity and quality of life assessments. This was a descriptive cross-sectional study with a sample of 351 individuals aged 65 and older residing in the community. Data acquisition was performed using the structured interview method, employing a core set of 25 codes taken from the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health and the WHOQOL-BREF instrument of the World Health Organization. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to infer the reliability and construct validity of the proposed model, involving three latent factors: functional capacity, quality of life, and patient satisfaction with nursing care received. The proposed model showed good reliability and construct validity, although it failed regarding discriminant validity between latent factors. The greatest statistically significant predictor of the patient satisfaction latent factor was the quality of life latent factor ([Formula: see text]), followed by the functional capacity latent factor ([Formula: see text]). The findings seem to suggest that patient satisfaction is an indicator that may be quantitatively measurable, with functional capacity and quality of life considered very significant predictors of patient satisfaction with the nursing care experience.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionQuality of LifeAgedCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID37165074
PMCPMC10172317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.