ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2023
Precise Brain-shift Prediction by New Combination of W-Net Deep Learning for Neurosurgical Navigation.
Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Deep learning in neurosurgery: a systematic literature review with a structured analysis of applications across subspecialties.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- ChatNSG: An Overview of Contemporary and Emerging Artificial Intelligence Models for the Neurosurgeon.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2026Article
- Fully automated image updating for brain shift compensation after dural opening.Journal of neurosurgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain tissue deformation during surgery significantly reduces the accuracy of image-guided neurosurgeries. We generated updated magnetic resonance images (uMR) in this study to compensate for brain shifts after dural opening using a convolutional neural network (CNN). This study included 248 consecutive patients who underwent craniotomy for initial intra-axial brain tumor removal and correspondingly underwent preoperative MR (pMR) and intraoperative MR (iMR) imaging. Deep learning using CNN to compensate for brain shift was performed using the pMR as input data, and iMR obtained after dural opening as the ground truth. For the tumor center (TC) and the maximum shift position (MSP), statistical analysis using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed between the target registration error (TRE) for the pMR and iMR (i.e., the actual amount of brain shift) and the TRE for the uMR and iMR (i.e., residual error after compensation). The TRE at the TC decreased from 4.14 ± 2.31 mm to 2.31 ± 1.15 mm, and the TRE at the MSP decreased from 9.61 ± 3.16 mm to 3.71 ± 1.98 mm. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test of the pMR TRE and uMR TRE yielded a p-value less than 0.0001 for both the TC and MSP. Using a CNN model, we designed and implemented a new system that compensated for brain shifts after dural opening. Learning pMR and iMR with a CNN demonstrated the possibility of correcting the brain shift after dural opening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.