ReviewEuropean journal of public health2023
Challenges in heart failure care in four European countries: a comparative study.
Review in European journal of public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Temporal Properties of Cardiorespiratory Coupling in Patients with Heart Failure During the Circadian Cycle.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Real-world evidence with dapagliflozin in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in Central Eastern Europe and the Baltic region (EVOLUTION-HF CEE-BA Study).ESC heart failure · 2026Observational
- Development and validation of clinical prediction models for personalized renal function monitoring in people with heart failure in primary care: the RENAL-HF study protocol.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Structuring telemonitoring in heart failure care in The Netherlands: design and operational protocol of a nationwide initiative.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Telemonitoring modalities in heart failure: comparative effectiveness across the heart failure population-a meta-analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Real-life implementation of guideline-recommended medical therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: Effects on prognosis and left ventricular ejection fraction. Primary results of TITRATE-HF.European journal of heart failure · 2025Observational
- Article
- Rurality, travel distance, and effectiveness of remote patient management in patients with heart failure in the TIM-HF2 trial in Germany: a pre-specified analysis of an open-label, randomised controlled trial.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Article
- The present and future of cardiological telemonitoring in Europe: a statement from seven European countries.Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2025Review
- Visualising the voices of nursing: a co-designed video capturing the lived experiences of nurses in Northern Ireland during the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- The impact of different perspectives on the cost-effectiveness of remote patient monitoring for patients with heart failure in different European countries.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025Article
- Heart Failure Nurses within the Primary Care Setting.Cardiac failure review · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Europe, more than 15 million people live with heart failure (HF). It imposes an enormous social, organizational and economic burden. As a reaction to impending impact on healthcare provision, different country-specific structures for HF-care have been established. The aim of this report is to provide an overview and compare the HF-care approaches of Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands and the UK, and to open the possibility of learning from each other's experience.
methodsA mixed methods approach was implemented that included a literature analysis, interviews and questionnaires with HF-patients and caregivers, and expert interviews with representatives from healthcare, health service research and medical informatics.
resultsThe models of HF-care in all countries analyzed are based on the European Society of Cardiology guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of HF. Even though the HF-models differed in design and implementation in practice, key challenges were similar: (i) unequal distribution of care between urban and rural areas, (ii) long waiting times, (iii) unequal access to and provision of healthcare services, (iv) information and communication gaps and (v) inadequate implementation and financing of digital applications.
conclusionAlthough promising approaches exist to structure and improve HF-care, across the four countries, implementation was reluctant to embrace novel methods. A lack of financial resources and insufficient digitalization making it difficult to adopt new concepts. Integration of HF-nurses seems to be an effective way of improving current models of HF-care. Digital solutions offer further opportunities to overcome communication and coordination gaps and to strengthen self-management skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.