Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37164624›Full record

ArticleOccupational and environmental medicine2023

Radon and lung cancer in the pooled uranium miners analysis (PUMA): highly exposed early miners and all miners.

Kaitlin Kelly-Reif, Stephen J Bertke, Estelle Rage, Paul A Demers, Nora Fenske, Veronika Deffner, Michaela Kreuzer, Jonathan Samet, Mary K Schubauer-Berigan, Ladislav Tomasek and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Indoor Radon Exposure Among Schoolchildren: A Systematic Review of Risk Factors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Kaitlin Kelly-ReifDivision of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA kkelly-reif@cdc.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-6020-2646
Stephen J BertkeDivision of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3047-3816
Estelle RageInstitute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3251-4124
Paul A DemersOccupational Cancer Research Centre, Ontario Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2163-2352
Nora FenskeFederal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), Munich (Neuherberg), Germany.
Veronika DeffnerFederal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), Munich (Neuherberg), Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5542-4132
Michaela KreuzerFederal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), Munich (Neuherberg), Germany.
Jonathan SametColorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Mary K Schubauer-BeriganEvidence Synthesis and Classification Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5175-924X
Ladislav TomasekNational Radiation Protection Institute, Prague, Czech Republic.
Lydia B ZablotskaEpidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Charles WigginsUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Dominique LaurierInstitute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
David B RichardsonDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of California, Irvine, Program in Public Health, Irvine, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8550-0212
Federal Office for Radiation Protection · DENational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · USNational Institute for Radiological Protection · CN3M (United States) · USCentre international de recherche sur le cancer · FRColorado School of Public Health · USNational Radiation Protection Institute · CZUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

US and Canadian uranium processing cohorts: exposure, risk and relevanceR21OH011452 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ZABLOTSKA, LYDIA B · 2018 to 2019
$367k
Combined analysis of lung cancer among uranium minersR03OH010946 · OH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RICHARDSON, DAVID B · 2015 to 2016
$152k
ACL HHS R21OH011452Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NIOSH CDC HHS R03 OH010946NIOSH CDC HHS R21 OH011452World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesRadon is a ubiquitous occupational and environmental lung carcinogen. We aim to quantify the association between radon progeny and lung cancer mortality in the largest and most up-to-date pooled study of uranium miners.

methodsThe pooled uranium miners analysis combines 7 cohorts of male uranium miners with 7754 lung cancer deaths and 4.3 million person-years of follow-up. Vital status and lung cancer deaths were ascertained between 1946 and 2014. The association between cumulative radon exposure in working level months (WLM) and lung cancer was modelled as the excess relative rate (ERR) per 100 WLM using Poisson regression; variation in the association by temporal and exposure factors was examined. We also examined analyses restricted to miners first hired before 1960 and with <100 WLM cumulative exposure.

resultsIn a model that allows for variation by attained age, time since exposure and annual exposure rate, the ERR/100 WLM was 4.68 (95% CI 2.88 to 6.96) among miners who were less than 55 years of age and were exposed in the prior 5 to <15 years at annual exposure rates of <0.5 WL. This association decreased with older attained age, longer time since exposure and higher annual exposure rate. In analyses restricted to men first hired before 1960, we observed similar patterns of association but a slightly lower estimate of the ERR/100 WLM.

conclusionsThis new large, pooled study confirms and supports a linear exposure-response relationship between cumulative radon exposure and lung cancer mortality which is jointly modified by temporal and exposure factors.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsNeoplasms, Radiation-InducedOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureRadonUraniumApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsCohort StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsRadonUraniumCancerMinersRadiationRadon

Identifiers

PMID37164624
PMCPMC10369304
OpenAlexW4376111246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.