Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37164484›Full record

ArticleGenome research2023

Gaps and complex structurally variant loci in phased genome assemblies.

David Porubsky, Mitchell R Vollger, William T Harvey, Allison N Rozanski, Peter Ebert, Glenn Hickey, Patrick Hasenfeld, Ashley D Sanders, Catherine Stober, Human Pangenome Reference Consortium and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Scalable Framework for Comprehensive Typing of Polymorphic Immune Genes from Long-Read Data.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Human acrocentric chromosome short armbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  14. Efficient near telomere-to-telomere assembly of Nanopore Simplex reads.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

David PorubskyDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8414-8966
Mitchell R VollgerDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8651-1615
William T HarveyDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0646-7528
Allison N RozanskiDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5034-1773
Peter EbertInstitute for Medical Biometry and Bioinformatics, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7441-532X
Glenn HickeyUC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2280-9404
Patrick HasenfeldEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2319-2482
Ashley D SandersBerlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, 10115 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3945-0677
Catherine StoberEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9481-013X
Human Pangenome Reference Consortium
Jan O KorbelEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2798-3794
Benedict PatenUC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8863-3539
Tobias MarschallInstitute for Medical Biometry and Bioinformatics, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9376-1030
Evan E EichlerDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA; eee@gs.washington.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8246-4014

Funding

The AnVIL Data Ecosystem DACReS SupplementU24HG010262 · NHGRI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI Robert J Carroll, Jonathan Lawson · 2018 to 2026
$40.5M
ELSI Administrative Supplement - Center for Human Reference Genome DiversityU01HG010971 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI EICHLER, EVAN, JARVIS, ERICH D · 2019 to 2023
$18.4M
GENCODE: comprehensive reference genome annotation for human and mouseU24HG007234 · NHGRI · EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY · PI Fergal James Martin · 2021 to 2026
$16.1M
Sequence and Assembly of Segmental DuplicationsR01HG002385 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Evan Eichler · 2001 to 2026
$13.3M
Medical Genetics Training GrantT32GM007454 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Gail Pairitz Jarvik, Andrew Ben Stergachis · 1985 to 2026
$6.9M
Enabling Comparative PangenomicsR01HG010485 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI HAUSSLER, DAVID H, MARTIN, FERGAL JAMES · 2020 to 2023
$2.6M
K-mer indexing for pan-genome reference annotationU01HG010963 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI JI, HANLEE P, WEISSMAN, TSACHY · 2020 to 2023
$1.3M
Representing structural haplotypes and complex genetic variation in pan-genome graphsU01HG010973 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI CHAISSON, MARK, EICHLER, EVAN · 2020 to 2023
$1.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002385NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010485NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG010963NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG010971NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG010973NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG007234NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG010262
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been tremendous progress in phased genome assembly production by combining long-read data with parental information or linked-read data. Nevertheless, a typical phased genome assembly generated by trio-hifiasm still generates more than 140 gaps. We perform a detailed analysis of gaps, assembly breaks, and misorientations from 182 haploid assemblies obtained from a diversity panel of 77 unique human samples. Although trio-based approaches using HiFi are the current gold standard, chromosome-wide phasing accuracy is comparable when using Strand-seq instead of parental data. Importantly, the majority of assembly gaps cluster near the largest and most identical repeats (including segmental duplications [35.4%], satellite DNA [22.3%], or regions enriched in GA/AT-rich DNA [27.4%]). Consequently, 1513 protein-coding genes overlap assembly gaps in at least one haplotype, and 231 are recurrently disrupted or missing from five or more haplotypes. Furthermore, we estimate that 6-7 Mbp of DNA are misorientated per haplotype irrespective of whether trio-free or trio-based approaches are used. Of these misorientations, 81% correspond to bona fide large inversion polymorphisms in the human species, most of which are flanked by large segmental duplications. We also identify large-scale alignment discontinuities consistent with 11.9 Mbp of deletions and 161.4 Mbp of insertions per haploid genome. Although 99% of this variation corresponds to satellite DNA, we identify 230 regions of euchromatic DNA with frequent expansions and contractions, nearly half of which overlap with 197 protein-coding genes. Such variable and incompletely assembled regions are important targets for future algorithmic development and pangenome representation.

Indexed as

DNA, SatellitePolymorphism, GeneticHaplotypesHumansSegmental Duplications, GenomicSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Satellite

Identifiers

PMID37164484
PMCPMC10234299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.