Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37164473›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Role of security guards in healthcare settings: a protocol for a systematic review.

Lindokuhle Shongwe, Saskia Hanft-Robert, Qhama Cossie, Philasande Sithole, Tessa Roos, Leslie Swartz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The impact of a brief psychoeducational intervention on hospital security personnel's attitudes towards aggression and violence management at Cecilia Makiwane Hospital.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lindokuhle ShongweDepartment of Psychology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Saskia Hanft-RobertDepartment for Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany s.hanft-robert@uke.de.ORCID 0000-0001-5766-1609
Qhama CossieDepartment of Health & Wellness, Valkenberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Philasande SitholeDepartment of Health & Wellness, Valkenberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Tessa RoosDepartment of Health & Wellness, Valkenberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Leslie SwartzDepartment of Psychology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is a paucity of literature on the comprehensive roles of security guards in healthcare, regardless of day-to-day observations of security guards playing an extensive role in this field. Thus, this review will systematically explore the roles of security guards in healthcare contexts to create a centred body of evidence. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study will systematically review existing quantitative and qualitative peer-reviewed literature on security guards in institutional healthcare so as to understand their roles. We will conduct the systematic review on 10 electronic databases: BioMed Central, SocIndex, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, JSTOR, PsycARTICLES, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science and PubMed. Data extraction will be in the form of a word document. Mendeley software will be used to keep track of references, while the systematic review software, Rayyan, will be used for the screening, inclusion and exclusion of articles. If necessary, reviewer number 3 will conduct a third review should any disputes arise between the two initial reviewers. Quality assessment of the articles will be measured with the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool for articles in terms of the research aims, methodology used, sample, data analysis, presentation of findings, values of the research, as well as trustworthiness if it is a qualitative study or reflexiveness if it is a quantitative study. Studies dating back 32 years will be incorporated for a comprehensive review. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review will use publicly available peer-reviewed data from electronic databases and will, therefore, not require an ethical review, but rather, an ethics waiver. The systematic review protocol will be submitted for ethics waiver clearance from the Stellenbosch University Health Research Ethics Committee. The findings from this review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022353653.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth FacilitiesHumansResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicGENERAL MEDICINE (see Internal Medicine)PSYCHIATRYPUBLIC HEALTHQuality in health care

Identifiers

PMID37164473
PMCPMC10174004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.