Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37163866›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2023

The impact of cigar pack size and pricing policies on youth and adult cigar use in the US.

Jessica King Jensen, Hyunkyu Ko, Jaewhan Kim, Cristine D Delnevo, Sunday Azagba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jessica King JensenRutgers Center for Tobacco Studies, 303 George Street, New Brunswick, NJ08901, USA; Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, 303 George Street, New Brunswick, NJ08901, USA. Electronic address: jessie.jensen@rutgers.edu.
Hyunkyu KoDepartment of Orthopeadics, Orthopaedic Center, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT  84108, USA.
Jaewhan KimDepartment of Physical Therapy & Athletic Training, University of Utah, 520 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT  84108, USA.
Cristine D DelnevoRoss and Carol Nese College of Nursing, Penn State University, Nursing Sciences Building, University Park, PA16802, USA.
Sunday AzagbaRoss and Carol Nese College of Nursing, Penn State University, Nursing Sciences Building, University Park, PA16802, USA; Social Science Research Institute, Penn State University, 114 Building, Henderson Drive, University Park, PA16802, USA.

Funding

Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR002538 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HESS, RACHEL, MAJERSIK, JENNIFER JUHL · 2018 to 2022
$26.0M
Tobacco Industry Marketing CoreU54CA229973 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CAPPELLA, JOSEPH NICHOLAS · 2018 to 2022
$18.8M
The Impact of Cigar Pack Quantity on Tobacco Use BehaviorsK01CA253235 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JENSEN, JESSICA KING · 2020 to 2024
$939k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002538NCI NIH HHS K01 CA253235NCI NIH HHS U54 CA229973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver 250 US localities have adopted cigar pack quantity and price policies. No empirical studies exist on their impact on tobacco use.

methodsA quasi-experimental design was used to assess the impact of cigar policies on cigar and cigarette use among (1) Minnesota youth (n=569,528, triennially 2007-2019); (2) New York youth (n=111,236, annually 2000-2020), (3) New York adults (n=62,295, annually 2003-2019), and (4) District of Columbia (DC) adults (n=5027, annually 2015-2019). We estimated the county-level policy coverage for 15 local policies in Minnesota. Differences-in-differences approach was used to compare the policy in NYC with the rest of the state (no policy). We examined changes in DC use before and after policy implementation. Analyses adjust for sociodemographic characteristics.

resultsIn Minnesota, youth in counties with a greater proportion of the population covered by a policy had lower odds of cigar use (AOR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.38-0.69). Similarly, adult cigar use in DC declined following policy enactment (AOR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.46-0.93). Cigarette use also decreased in both Minnesota and DC following policy enactment. However, in New York, the NYC policy did not have a significant impact on cigar use among youth (AOR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.47-1.93) or adults (AOR: 1.98; 95% CI: 0.85-1.37) in NYC compared to the rest of the state. The only significant effect in NYC was reduced odds for adult cigarette use (AOR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.68-0.92).

conclusionsFindings suggest regulating cigar packaging could decrease cigar consumption without increasing cigarette consumption, but effects may differ across jurisdictions.

Indexed as

Tobacco ProductsAdolescentAdultCosts and Cost AnalysisHumansMinnesotaPolicyTobacco UsePolicyTobaccoTobacco products

Identifiers

PMID37163866
PMCPMC10330501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.