Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37163537›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Lipidomics-based tissue heterogeneity in specimens of luminal breast cancer revealed by clustering analysis of mass spectrometry imaging: A preliminary study.

Shuhei Aramaki, Shogo Tsuge, Ariful Islam, Fumihiro Eto, Takumi Sakamoto, Soho Oyama, Wenxin Li, Chi Zhang, Shinichi Yamaguchi, Daiki Takatsuka and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Eigenlipids for exploring lipid biology.Journal of lipid research · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Structure Analysis of Gangliosides: Mass Spectrometry Imaging.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shuhei AramakiDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Anatomy, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.
Shogo TsugeDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Anatomy, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.
Ariful IslamDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Anatomy, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7497-3540
Fumihiro EtoDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Anatomy, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.
Takumi SakamotoDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Anatomy, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2271-9975
Soho OyamaDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Anatomy, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.
Wenxin LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.
Chi ZhangDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Anatomy, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.
Shinichi YamaguchiAnalytical & Measuring Instruments Division, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan.
Daiki Takatsuka1st Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.
Yuko Hosokawa1st Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.
A S M WaliullahDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Anatomy, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6778-379X
Yutaka TakahashiDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Anatomy, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.
Kenji KikushimaDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Anatomy, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8674-9554
Tomohito SatoDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Anatomy, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.
Kei Koizumi1st Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.
Hiroyuki Ogura1st Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.
Tomoaki KahyoDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Anatomy, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.
Satoshi BabaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Norihiko Shiiya1st Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.
Haruhiko SugimuraFirst Department of Pathology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.
Katsumasa NakamuraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.
Mitsutoshi SetouDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Anatomy, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4672-187X
Hamamatsu University School of Medicine · JPShimadzu (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer tissues reflect a greater number of pathological characteristics of cancer compared to cancer cells, so the evaluation of cancer tissues can be effective in determining cancer treatment strategies. Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) can evaluate cancer tissues and even identify molecules while preserving spatial information. Cluster analysis of cancer tissues' MSI data is currently used to evaluate the phenotype heterogeneity of the tissues. Interestingly, it has been reported that phenotype heterogeneity does not always coincide with genotype heterogeneity in HER2-positive breast cancer. We thus investigated the phenotype heterogeneity of luminal breast cancer, which is generally known to have few gene mutations. As a result, we identified phenotype heterogeneity based on lipidomics in luminal breast cancer tissues. Clusters were composed of phosphatidylcholine (PC), triglycerides (TG), phosphatidylethanolamine, sphingomyelin, and ceramide. It was found that mainly the proportion of PC and TG correlated with the proportion of cancer and stroma on HE images. Furthermore, the number of carbons in these lipid class varied from cluster to cluster. This was consistent with the fact that enzymes that synthesize long-chain fatty acids are increased through cancer metabolism. It was then thought that clusters containing PCs with high carbon counts might reflect high malignancy. These results indicate that lipidomics-based phenotype heterogeneity could potentially be used to classify cancer for which genetic analysis alone is insufficient for classification.

Indexed as

LipidomicsNeoplasmsCluster AnalysisMass SpectrometryTriglyceridesTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID37163537
PMCPMC10171676
OpenAlexW4376132583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.