Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37163411›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on nanobioscience2023

Individualized Seizure Cluster Prediction Using Machine Learning and Chronic Ambulatory Intracranial EEG.

Krishnakant V Saboo, Yurui Cao, Vaclav Kremen, Vladimir Sladky, Nicholas M Gregg, Paul M Arnold, Philippa J Karoly, Dean R Freestone, Mark J Cook, Gregory A Worrell and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on nanobioscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Machine-learning methods for epilepsy diagnosis and therapeutic prevention: advances, setbacks, and opportunities.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Krishnakant V Saboo
Yurui Cao
Vaclav Kremen
Vladimir Sladky
Nicholas M Gregg
Paul M Arnold
Philippa J Karoly
Dean R Freestone
Mark J Cook
Gregory A Worrell
Ravishankar K Iyer
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USThe University of Melbourne · AUCarle Foundation Hospital · US

Funding

Reliable Seizure Prediction Using Physiological Signals and Machine LearningR01NS092882 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Gregory A Worrell · 2015 to 2026
$5.7M
Neurophysiologically Based Brain State Tracking & Modulation in Focal EpilepsyUH3NS095495 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI WORRELL, GREGORY A · 2019 to 2021
$2.8M
Optimizing Pharmacotherapy with Noninvasive Wearable Sensors and Subscalp EEGUH3NS123066 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Benjamin H Brinkmann, Gregory A Worrell · 2025 to 2026
$1.4M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS092882NINDS NIH HHS UH3 NS095495NINDS NIH HHS UH3 NS123066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epilepsy patients often experience acute repetitive seizures, known as seizure clusters, which can progress to prolonged seizures or status epilepticus if left untreated. Predicting the onset of seizure clusters is crucial to enable patients to receive preventative treatments. Additionally, studying the patterns of seizure clusters can help predict the seizure type (isolated or cluster) after observing a just occurred seizure. This paper presents machine learning models that use bivariate intracranial EEG (iEEG) features to predict seizure clustering. Specifically, we utilized relative entropy (REN) as a bivariate feature to capture potential differences in brain region interactions underlying isolated and cluster seizures. We analyzed a large ambulatory iEEG dataset collected from 15 patients and spanned up to 2 years of recordings for each patient, consisting of 3341 cluster seizures (from 427 clusters) and 369 isolated seizures. The dataset's substantial number of seizures per patient enabled individualized analyses and predictions. We observed that REN was significantly different between isolated and cluster seizures in majority of the patients. Machine learning models based on REN: 1) predicted whether a seizure will occur soon after a given seizure with up to 69.5% Area under the ROC Curve (AUC), 2) predicted if a seizure is the first one in a cluster with up to 55.3% AUC, outperforming baseline techniques. Overall, our findings could be beneficial in addressing the clinical burden associated with seizure clusters, enabling patients to receive timely treatments and improving their quality of life.

Indexed as

ElectrocorticographyEpilepsyElectroencephalographyHumansMachine LearningQuality of LifeSeizures

Identifiers

PMID37163411
PMCPMC10702269
OpenAlexW4376132750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.