Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37163368›Full record

ReviewJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2023

Post or perish? Social media strategies for disseminating orthopedic research.

Evan G Buettmann, Carolyn Chlebek, Carly A Lockard, Sade W Clayton, Karl J Lewis, Kelsey H Collins

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Evan G BuettmannDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8439-477X
Carolyn ChlebekCenter for Molecular Medicine, MaineHealth Institute for Research, Scarborough, Maine, USA.
Carly A LockardStephens Family Clinical Research Institute, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Sade W ClaytonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9798-2594
Karl J LewisDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Kelsey H CollinsDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Funding

Training Program in Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases ResearchT32AR069516 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI John D Mountz · 2016 to 2026
$2.6M
The Role of Fat in OsteoarthritisR00AR078949 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI COLLINS, KELSEY HELEN-MARIE · 2023 to 2025
$715k
The Role of Fat in OsteoarthritisK99AR078949 · NIAMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI COLLINS, KELSEY HELEN-MARIE · 2022 to 2023
$98k
NIAMS NIH HHS K99 AR078949NIAMS NIH HHS R00 AR078949NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR069516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social media usage, particularly Twitter, among scientists in academia has increased in recent years. However, Twitter's use in scholarly post-publication dissemination of orthopaedic research and musculoskeletal advocacy remains low. To enhance usage of Twitter among musculoskeletal researchers, this article reviews data supporting the professional benefits of using the platform to disseminate scholarly works. Next, we provide a linear workflow for Tweet curation, discuss the importance of data-driven decision making behind tweet curation and posting, and propose new guidelines for professional Twitter usage. Since this workflow may not eliminate all the identified barriers and new institutionalized shifts in policies regarding curation and consumption of social media on Twitter, we also briefly introduce and explore using other social media platforms. We hope this information will be persuasive and compelling to those in the orthopedic research field and be broadly applicable to others in related scientific fields who wish to disseminate findings and engage a public audience on social media. In addition, we encourage the Orthopedic Research Society (ORS) and Journal of Orthopedic Research (JOR) communities to take advantage of the many tools curated by the Wiley editorial office and the ORS social media committee to increase dissemination of their scholarly works online. Twitter and social media can assist in accomplishing our mission of creating a world without musculoskeletal limitations via the timely dissemination of orthopedic information. However, this can only be accomplished if the orthopedic research community has a unified and strong online presence actively engaged in orthopaedic research findings and news.

Indexed as

Social MediaHumansResearch Personnelaltmetricsbibliometricsorthopedic researchsocial mediaTwitter

Identifiers

PMID37163368
PMCPMC10524931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.