Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37163363›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2023

General Method to Obtain Collision Cross-Section Values in Multipass High-Resolution Cyclic Ion Mobility Separations.

Sanaz C Habibi, Gabe Nagy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Stereoselectivity of Galactosylation Reactions In Vacuo.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Conformation-Specific Approach to Native Top-down Mass Spectrometry.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sanaz C HabibiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, 315 South 1400 East, Room 2020, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4129-962X
Gabe NagyDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, 315 South 1400 East, Room 2020, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9007-4422

Funding

A bioanalytical research program to unravel the human milk glycomeR35GM146671 · NIGMS · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Gabe Nagy · 2022 to 2026
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM146671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry (IMS-MS) has advanced the field of omics-based research, especially with the development of high-resolution platforms; however, these separations have generally been qualitative in nature. The rotationally averaged ion neutral collision cross section (CCS) is one of the only quantitative metrics available for aiding in characterizing biomolecules in IMS-MS. However, determining the CCS of an ion for multipass IMS systems, such as in cyclic ion mobility-mass spectrometry (cIMS-MS) and structures for lossless ion manipulations, has been challenging due to the lack of methods available for calculating CCS when more than a single pass is required for separation as well as the laborious nature of requiring calibrants and unknown compounds to be subjected to identical number of passes, which may not be possible in certain instances because of peak splitting, high levels of diffusion, etc. Herein, we present a general method that uses average ion velocities for calculating CCS values in cIMS-MS-based separations. Initially, we developed calibration curves using common CCS calibrants [i.e., tetra-alkylammonium salts, polyalanine, and hexakis(fluoroalkoxy)phosphazines] at different traveling wave (TW) conditions and the calculated cIMS CCS values were within ∼1% error or less compared to previously established drift tube IMS CCS measurements. Since it has been established that glycans can split into their α/β anomers, we utilized this method for two glycan species, 2α-mannobiose and melibiose. Both glycans were analyzed at the same TW conditions as the calibrants, and we observed anomer splitting at pathlengths of 20 m for 2α-mannobiose and 40 m for melibiose and thus assigned two unique CCS values for each glycan, which is the first time this has ever been done. We have demonstrated that the use of average ion velocities is a robust approach for obtaining CCS values with good agreement to CCS measurements from the previous literature and anticipate that this methodology can be applied to any IMS-MS platform that utilizes multipass separations. Our future work aims to incorporate this methodology for the development of a high-resolution CCS database to aid in the characterization of human milk oligosaccharides.

Identifiers

PMID37163363
PMCPMC10308260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.