ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2023
High-resolution/High-Speed Gap Can Distinguish Different Intraretinal Perfusion Signals by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative Optical Coherence Tomography Detection of New Neovascular Branches and Association With Exudation Recurrence in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The development of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) has radically changed the diagnostic assessment of the intraretinal vascular network. Two different OCTA acquisition modalities have recently been introduced in clinical practice, namely high-resolution (HR) and high-speed (HS) scans. HR OCTA requires more acquisition time and provides higher quality data, whereas HS OCTA is faster but furnishes lower quality data. The main aim of the present study is to gauge how much extra blood flow perfusion information can be obtained through the combined use of HR and HS OCTA. Methods: We compared HR and HS OCTA acquisitions to assess the reliability of both techniques, also putting forward a new set of quantitative metrics to measure the HR/HS OCTA gap and to highlight different perfusion information. Results: In essence, both HR and HS OCTA acquisitions proved highly feasible in detecting the intraretinal vascular flow signal, as confirmed by the stability of quantitative OCTA metrics, thus displaying their suitability for use in clinical practice. We detected an HR/HS overlapping gap of 21.6 ± 6.5% for intraretinal capillaries, and 4.3 ± 1.2% for choriocapillaris, highlighting the greater information obtained by HR OCTA. Conclusions: This novel HR/HS OCTA gap assessment might pave the way for the development of new quantitative metrics for retinal diseases that would focus on the earlier detection of perfusion impairment and relate it to the stage of the disease and its progression. Translational Relevance: This study proposes a new quantitative way to detect different perfusion signals based on OCTA. The findings presented in this paper can lay the foundations for the development of new quantitative metrics focused on the separate analysis of high flow and low flow signals, enabling very early changes in intraretinal perfusion to be detected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.