Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37163070›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

Dozer: Debiased personalized gene co-expression networks for population-scale scRNA-seq data.

Shan Lu, Sündüz Keleş

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shan LuDepartment of Statistics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Sündüz KeleşDepartment of Statistics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.

Funding

Statistical Methods for the Analysis of ChlP-chip DataR01HG003747 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KELES, SUNDUZ · 2007 to 2024
$4.8M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG003747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Population-scale single cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) datasets create unique opportunities for quantifying expression variation across individuals at the gene co-expression network level. Estimation of co-expression networks is well-established for bulk RNA-seq; however, single-cell measurements pose novel challenges due to technical limitations and noise levels of this technology. Gene-gene correlation estimates from scRNA-seq tend to be severely biased towards zero for genes with low and sparse expression. Here, we present Dozer to debias gene-gene correlation estimates from scRNA-seq datasets and accurately quantify network level variation across individuals. Dozer corrects correlation estimates in the general Poisson measurement model and provides a metric to quantify genes measured with high noise. Computational experiments establish that Dozer estimates are robust to mean expression levels of the genes and the sequencing depths of the datasets. Compared to alternatives, Dozer results in fewer false positive edges in the co-expression networks, yields more accurate estimates of network centrality measures and modules, and improves the faithfulness of networks estimated from separate batches of the datasets. We showcase unique analyses enabled by Dozer in two population-scale scRNA-seq applications. Co-expression network-based centrality analysis of multiple differentiating human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) lines yields biologically coherent gene groups that are associated with iPSC differentiation efficiency. Application with population-scale scRNA-seq of oligodendrocytes from postmortem human tissues of Alzheimer disease and controls uniquely reveals co-expression modules of innate immune response with markedly different co-expression levels between the diagnoses. Dozer represents an important advance in estimating personalized co-expression networks from scRNA-seq data.

Identifiers

PMID37163070
PMCPMC10168282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.