ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2023
Transformer based deep learning denoising of single and multi-delay 3D Arterial Spin Labeling.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To present a Swin Transformer-based deep learning (DL) model for denoising of single-delay and multi-delay 3D arterial spin labeling (ASL) and compare its performance with convolutional neural network (CNN) methods. Methods: Swin Transformer and CNN-based spatial denoising models were developed for single-delay ASL. The models were trained on 59 subjects (104 scans) and tested on 44 subjects (57 scans) from 3 different vendors. Spatiotemporal denoising models were developed using another dataset (6 subjects, 10 scans) of multi-delay ASL. A range of input conditions was tested for denoising single and multi-delay ASL respectively. The performance was evaluated using similarity metrics, spatial signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and quantification accuracy of cerebral blood flow (CBF) and arterial transit time (ATT). Results: Swin Transformer outperformed CNN-based networks, whereas pseudo-3D models showed better performance than 2D models for denoising single-delay ASL. The similarity metrics and image quality (SNR) improved with more slices in pseudo-3D models, and further improved when using M0 as input but introduced greater biases for CBF quantification. Pseudo-3D models with 3 slices as input achieved optimal balance between SNR and accuracy, which can be generalized to different vendors. For multi-delay, spatiotemporal denoising models had better performance than spatial-only models with reduced biases in fitted CBF and ATT maps. Conclusions: Swin Transformer DL models provided better performance than CNN methods for denoising both single and multi-delay 3D ASL data. The proposed model offers flexibility to improve image quality and/or reduce scan time for 3D ASL to facilitate its clinical use.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.