Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37162875›Full record

ArticleResearch square2023

Engaging Adolescents and Young Adults in Decisions About Return of Genomic Research Results: a mixed-methods longitudinal clinical trial protocol.

Amy Blumling, Michelle McGowan, Cynthia Prows, Kristin Childers-Buschle, Lisa Martin, John Lynch, Kevin Dufendach, Ellen Lipstein, Melinda Butsch Kovacic, Bill Brinkman and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amy BlumlingCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.
Michelle McGowanMayo Clinic.
Cynthia ProwsCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.
Kristin Childers-BuschleCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.
Lisa MartinCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.
John LynchUniversity of Cincinnati.
Kevin DufendachCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.
Ellen LipsteinCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.
Melinda Butsch KovacicUniversity of Cincinnati.
Bill BrinkmanCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.
Melanie MyersCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USUniversity of Cincinnati · US

Funding

LCenter for Clinical and Translational Science and TrainingUL1TR001425 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI HEUBI, JAMES E., KISSELA, BRETT M · 2015 to 2024
$37.5M
Engaging adolescents in decisions about return of genomic research resultsR01HG010166 · NHGRI · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI MCGOWAN, MICHELLE L, MYERS, MELANIE F · 2019 to 2023
$3.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001425NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010166
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To protect minors' future autonomy, professional organizations have historically discouraged returning predictive adult-onset genetic test results and carrier status to children. Recent clinical guidance diverges from this norm, suggesting that when minors have genomic sequencing performed for clinical purposes, parents and children should have the opportunity to learn secondary findings, including for some adult-onset conditions. While parents can currently opt in or out of receiving their child's secondary findings, the American Society of Human Genetics Workgroup on Pediatric Genetic and Genomic Testing suggests including adolescents in the decision-making process. However, it is not clear what factors young people consider when given the opportunity to learn genetic findings for themselves. We are examining adolescents', young adults', and parents' (if applicable) decisions about learning genomic information for the adolescent. Methods: We are enrolling assenting (ages 13-17) adolescents and consenting (ages 18-21) young adults in a prospective genomic screening study to assess the choices they make about receiving individual genomic results. Participants use an online tool to indicate whether they want to learn their personal genetic risk for specific preventable, treatable, and adult-onset conditions, as well as carrier status for autosomal recessive conditions. We are examining 1) how choices differ between adolescent and young adult cohorts (as well as between adolescents/young adults and parents) and 2) decisional conflict and stability across study timepoints. Results are returned based on participants' choices. Qualitative interviews with a subset of participants explore decisional stability, adolescent/young adult engagement with parents in decision-making, and the impact of learning pathogenic/likely pathogenic and carrier results. Discussion: This study explores decision making and decision stability between adolescents and parents (where applicable), as well as the ethical implications and impact of return of clinical-grade genetic research results to adolescents and young adults. The results of this study will contribute empirical evidence to support best practices and guidance on engaging young people in genetic research studies and clinical care that offer return of results.

Identifiers

PMID37162875
PMCPMC10168476
OpenAlexW4367185484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.