Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37162798›Full record

ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602023

Health Communication Research Informs Inflammatory Bowel Disease Practice and Research: A Narrative Review.

Neda Karimi, Alison Rotha Moore, Annabelle Lukin, Susan J Connor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Neda KarimiSouth Western Sydney Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research Group, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2841-637X
Alison Rotha MooreSchool of Humanities and Social Inquiry, Faculty of Law, Humanities and the Arts, The University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9697-5747
Annabelle LukinDepartment of Linguistics, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1023-7207
Susan J ConnorSouth Western Sydney Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research Group, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5606-0270
Liverpool Hospital · AUMacquarie University · AUUniversity of Wollongong · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In the absence of targeted empirical evidence on effective clinical communication in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), a broad overview of existing evidence on effective communication in healthcare and available recommendations for communication in telehealth is provided and mapped onto IBD research and practice. Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted using Pubmed and Scopus databases and snowballing literature search. Results: Evidence-based Conclusions: Use of question prompt lists, decision aids, micro-lessons, and communication training interventions for clinicians could be beneficial in IBD care. Further research into the implementation of such interventions as well as clinical communication concerns specific to IBD is warranted.

Indexed as

clinical communicationdisease outcomesdoctor–patient relationshippatient involvementtelehealth

Identifiers

PMID37162798
PMCPMC10164291
OpenAlexW4366770748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.